All you have done is to substitute one word in the place of another. Here, anyone can do that "One word: Gilbert" Easy Face it dude , the reality is you're just one great big hippy. stu
The work of Buckminster Fuller is a wonderful example of taking the principles of classical engineering and perfecting them through idealistic refinement. Science is on the threshold of moving into a new era of scientific understanding that will reveal energy to be generated by patterns of attraction rather than patterns of resistance. Magnetism may be viewed as either derivative or primary, depending on one's level of understanding. In its primary condition there are no polarities and no scarcities. Now contemplate a civilization in which energy is not a commodity over which to fight or hoard. Can you see how that would change everything? But this will be built on a philosophical construct: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the Sons of God". Salvation is for the mind, and it is attained by peace. Jesus
OK "professor" lets create a null hypothesis. What populations shall we study? How will you show generals who win five major battles in a row could have done so randomly. I suspect any null hypothesis you suggest will by an intellectual farce. But I am willing to see you try.
"Create" a null hypothesis? How many more jokes are you going to create in this thread? If you have no idea what a null hypothesis is, ask nicely and someone might clue you in.
set up the analysis and please make sure it is not a farce. You are playing games to avoid your own embarrassment. I will say I have no idea what your null hypothesis will be, because anyone you choose will be a farce or not relevant to generals winning 5 major battles in a row.
What analysis? Do you have any idea what a null hypothesis is? Let me repeat, ask nicely and someone might explain it to you. Or you can choose to be arrogant and continue to expose your ignorance. Edit: You added that last sentence after I typed the reply. This is funnier now. You have no idea what my null hypothesis will be? Geez, how many null hypotheses do you think are possible? Edit2: I want to be nice and give you another clue. Look up in the dictionary for the meaning of "null." Null hypothesis. Get it?
By the way you do create a null hypothesis. You might say in the drug trial that there is no difference between cancer survivial rates on the populations. One population being studied would get drug A and one drug B. It is now obvious to everyone that you are diging a deeper hole to avoid admitting that you did not understand probability theory.
No. The more you say, the more you show that you don't understand what a null hypothesis is. Null means none, nothing, nada, zero, zilch. Do you get it now?