LOL. Every post of yours makes you a bigger joke! Did you misunderstand the hint I gave you? Statistics is used to discern patterns, random or not. One does not need random samples a priori. In clinical trials, random samples are needed to eliminate correlations to other factors not related to the drugs being tested. But that doesn't mean statistics can only be applied to random samples. If that were the case, how can one ever infer correlation? Do you know what a null hypothesis is?
God is real but the Universe isn't because a movie is a real movie, but it isn't real really. The projector is real, as is the one who filmed the movie, and the one showing the movie. Have I got this right? So we go to see movies on things that are real, ( for jem's Firefox word re-speller setting - that will be 'reel' ) and when the electric goes out, the screen stays the same that is - real. but it doesn't does it. The movie has stopped. That's unreal, even for you ZZzz. So the thing about reality which makes God real but not the Universe is a 2bit down town flea palace which can't run a movie show. Fat help. Let's see what Iam has. It can't be any worse than that. Can it?
Yes but that is besides the point. You have equated a truly random of event, coing flips to generals winning battles.
Geez, anything you don't understand is "mistaken?" How more arrogant can you be? (Especially since you know nothing about science). I'm under no obligation to teach you. Besides, you continue to refuse to learn. The example about the battles and the generals I gave is to illustrate the need for a null hypothesis when one makes generalizing assumptions. You never got the point, and are clueless enough to say it was "mistaken!" What a joke you expose yourself to be!
How can you know what a null hypothesis is and then continue with this nonsense? Everything you've said so far tells me that you have no clue what a null hypothesis is.
Is a movie fake? Of course not, it is a real movie. Is a magic trick a fake illusion? Nope, a real illusion, but an illusion none the less. A movie is a real projection onto a screen, but few but the brain damaged think what is happening on the screen is "reality" apart from what is on the screen. From the perspective of God and those who are enlightened by God, according to eastern thinking, there is in the final analysis no reality of duality, there is only unity with God, as God is everything, nothing is separate from God. Those who are not actually experiencing oneness with God all the time are under the delusion and ignorance of material existence. Therefore the ignorance of human beings who live in a state of duality experiencing themselves separate from God within the boundaries of the universe are not experiencing what is ultimately real, as unity is the true reality, they are however experiencing a real delusion...it is as if the movie actors on the screen suddenly had consciousness within the screening time of the movie, they would think themselves as really having the experiences within the structure of the movie, but in reality, it is not real by just a movie. Just as a dream seems very real at the time, the dream state experience are not considered valid as relates to waking condition. The dreams are very real in their own way, they are not fake dreams....but the dream state experiences are not considered as reality from the waking point of view. I kind of figured anything beyond a two dimension thought process would leave you slobbering...and you confirmed that in your post.
Assuming that this view is correct, then is there any reason why man cannot scientifically measure God? And, if so, then is there any reason why man cannot model God -- and from there become equal to God?