Intelligent Design is not creationism

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Teleologist, Nov 4, 2006.

  1. Miller presents an excellent case for a thinking audience during the course of about an hour. How can I hope to present what he had to say anywhere near as well as he did? Further, how much typing would it involve to cover enough material to do his argument justice? If you're not willing to listen to it, I sure as hell am not going to bother typing it for you. You pretend that you want dialogue, but you do not. You are just playing games. You don't really care what anyone has to say. Like Bush, you seem have that special ability to make informed decisions in a vacuum. And that is your prerogative. As it is mine to no longer waste any more time on this merry-go-round.

    It is interesting that you engage extensively in cut-and-paste posting. Not that I mind, because some of them are worth reading. I guess it just doesn't work both ways, does it?
     
    #141     Nov 9, 2006
  2. You responded to my post in the first person -- and my post was directed to Teleologist in the first person. This clearly indicates that you believed you were responding to a post directed to you.

    But, alas you forgot to change your alias, and now you've been discovered.

    This being the case, there's no reason to discuss the subject matter further. Teleologist is you, and I already know your position on the issue.
     
    #142     Nov 9, 2006
  3. Cases can be presented in a few quick points...

    It isn't hard for you to say what his case is in a sentence or two...

    Yes, I do enjoy a dialogue, so please go ahead and start one with your own ideas...

    Re the cut and paste, try scanning videos on the Internet, you can't do it they way they stream in...

    I can scan an article cut and paste in a few minutes, you can't do that with the 2 hour videos...

     
    #143     Nov 9, 2006
  4. Once again, your reasoning is flawed...along with your conclusions...

    The moderators who can see IP addresses of posters know the facts, obviously you don't...

    Really funny that you would stoop this low to try and save face...

    Or maybe you are insane, who knows?


     
    #144     Nov 9, 2006
  5. You and Teleologist are the same person. Simple as that.
     
    #145     Nov 9, 2006
  6. Provide proof...

    Without proof, just BS...

     
    #146     Nov 9, 2006
  7. Already have. The thread speaks for itself.

    Prove you're not.
     
    #147     Nov 9, 2006
  8. I had no idea what you did in your absence, but it appears the medication needs adjustment...

    By the way, prove that you are not having sex with a dog right now...

     
    #148     Nov 9, 2006
  9. Nice call, kj. Tone is pretty much the same and check that post count. Definitely zEvader-type frequency.

    I liked his bit about IP addresses. I don't think it's that hard to appear as if you're logging in from different IP addresses, is it?
     
    #149     Nov 9, 2006
  10. More troll gobbledygook...

     
    #150     Nov 9, 2006