Intelligence Analysts Say War Spread Terrorism

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ktmexc20, Sep 24, 2006.

  1. #31     Sep 28, 2006
  2. u guys are totally unable to broker anything any more in that part of the world... ink spots wld've been the way to go in Iraq but u didn't have the right resources... and cldn't get them from normally 'allied' countries either cause your cuntness all along has alienated them...

    lets wait until Bush & the neocons can't but puke over the number of body bags coming home to rot... then perhaps you'll realize that u have to hand over to people / organizations who can actually DEAL with the mess you've created...

    we getting tired of u kids... isolate yr ass if u must... honestly thats one of the best things u cld do for the rest of the planet...
     
    #32     Sep 28, 2006
  3. Surprise, surprise! Fighting in Iraq is spawning more terrorists! Well, who woulda thunk it? By being involved in a conflict in Iraq, we are increasing the danger level. No! By Allah it cannot be!

    So, we should not have fueled the threat by declaring our independence from England?

    We should not have fueled the threat when Pearl Harbor was bombed?

    We should not have fueled the threat by standing up to the Soviets?

    A woman about to be raped should not fuel the threat by resisting the rapist? An old lady should not resist the mugger?

    Some moonbats following 9/11 said that if we attacked Afghanistan we would just make things worse. Heck, loonies like Cindy Sheehan still say that today.

    A poll in '02 of several Muslim countries, I believe it was a Gallup poll, found that the overwhelming majority of their citizens thought the US was not justified in attacking the Taliban in Afghanistan. So, should we not then have done so?

    We should not have supported the mujahedin, including OBL, when they were resisting the USSR, because now many of them are now fighting us? It would have made strategic sense to allow the USSR to win that war?

    Would the Muslim mobs not have burned Danish embassies over the cartoons if we weren't in Iraq? If we had not invaded Iraq, millions of resentful Arabs would have become open heart surgeons or librarians and chose to leave us alone instead of waging or supporting jihad? The Pope's murder would not have been called for if Kerry was sitting in the Oval Office?

    I guess we should just not fuel the threat and just throw in the white flag and admit that sharia is inevitable, and we oughta just start buying the burkhas.

    Doh!
     
    #33     Sep 29, 2006
  4. ^^In reference to above mentioned poll^^

    Poll: Majority of Muslims view U.S. unfavorably

    February 26, 2002 Posted: 2:42 PM EST (1942 GMT)

    PRINCETON, New Jersey (CNN) -- A majority of people interviewed in nine Muslim countries had unfavorable opinions of the United States and President Bush, according to a new Gallup poll.

    Most respondents also said they think the U.S. military action in Afghanistan is morally unjustified.

    Researchers conducted face-to-face interviews with 9,924 residents of Pakistan, Iran, Indonesia, Turkey, Lebanon, Morocco, Kuwait, Jordan and Saudi Arabia to gauge public opinion in those countries following the September 11 attacks on the United States. About half of the world's Muslim population lives in those nine countries.

    In the survey, 53 percent of the people questioned had unfavorable opinions of the United States, while 22 percent had favorable opinions.

    A favorable opinion of the United States was highest in Lebanon, at 41 percent, and Turkey, at 40 percent, and lowest in Pakistan, at 5 percent. Twenty-eight percent of Kuwaitis, 27 percent of Indonesians, 22 percent of Jordanians, 22 percent of Moroccans, 16 percent of Saudi Arabians and 14 percent of Iranians surveyed had a favorable view of the United States.

    On Bush, 58 percent of those surveyed had unfavorable opinions, compared with 11 percent who had favorable views.

    Of those surveyed, 67 percent saw the September 11 attacks as morally unjustified, while 15 percent of the respondents said they were morally justified.

    But an even greater number -- 77 percent -- said the U.S. military action in Afghanistan was morally unjustified compared with 9 percent who said it was morally justified.

    The survey also found that 61 percent said they did not believe Arab groups carried out the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. Of those surveyed, 18 percent said they did believe Arab organizations were responsible.

    The interviews were conducted between December and January. The respondents were randomly selected and did not know a U.S. firm was sponsoring the poll.

    Gallup said the sampling error was plus or minus 1 percentage point for questions asked in all nine countries and plus or minus 4 percentage points for questions broken down by individual nations.

    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/02/26/gallup.moslems/
     
    #34     Sep 29, 2006
  5. achilles28

    achilles28

    The Neocons welcome terror with open arms - it just furthers their stated agenda.

    Think outside the box.

    The three thousand civilian lives that were sacrificed on 9/11 locked up America's global dominance for the next 50 years.


    Terrorism isn't a security threat for this country. It's a security BOON.

    Terrorism is the blank cheque that rationalizes every oil-grab, occupation and limitless military-spend in a zero-sum world.

    Thats why your Southern Border remains wide open.

    You and your family are chattel - the sacrificial lambs for the New American State forged right before your very eyes.

    You are the ultimate patriots. Be Proud.
     
    #35     Sep 29, 2006
  6. achilles28

    achilles28


    Nice try. Iraq didn't attack the United States. Nor was Iraq ever a threat.

    Iraq was a paper-tiger - determined as such by Bush's own commissions who completed the postmortem.

    This nation went to war on nothing more than paranoia and trumped up 'intelligence' (sometimes egregious lies) cherry-picked to fit a forgone directive.


    You partisan fools want to make this a Red or Blue issue. Its neither.

    Both sides of the aisle are in complete agreement when it comes to taking turns on the American peoples ass.

    Most of you still fall for the ol' Red/Blue scapegoat mentality, which makes the lot of you "savvy pundits" complete dips.


    Check out the porous Southern Border lately?

    Why dont you go ask "Homeland Security".
     
    #36     Sep 29, 2006
  7. ^^I see you've already bought your burkha. How are the Arabic lessons going?
     
    #37     Sep 29, 2006
  8. So basically, they poll about the same as activist democrat voters?
     
    #38     Sep 30, 2006
  9. achilles28

    achilles28


    WHOOSH!
     
    #39     Sep 30, 2006
  10. [​IMG]
     
    #40     Oct 2, 2006