Earlier 2011 paper on the same. Will read later. Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression https://www.researchgate.net/public...anhood_and_Its_Links_to_Action_and_Aggression Unlike womanhood, manhood is widely viewed as a status that is elusive (it must be earned) and tenuous (it must be demonstrated repeatedly through actions). This focus on the structure—rather than the content—of gender roles can shed new light on men’s use of action and physical aggression. Here, we review theory and research connecting manhood, action, and aggression. We interpret men’s aggression and aggressive displays as behaviors that effectively demonstrate manhood and thus quell men’s concerns about their gender status. Moreover, we suggest that situational and cultural factors that heighten the precariousness of manhood also increase the likelihood of male aggression.
And "Precarious manhood (PM) theory" is a polished turd with no factual basis pushed by those on the left. It has no basis in science or reality.
And "Inoculation theory" is a polished turd with no factual basis pushed by heretics. It has no basis in God or reality. __you, circa 1700's
Witty, but wimpy comment there. Do you have the testicular fortitude to directly respond to my post? If you are nervous about the prospect of having a debate with me, suck it up, take a few deep breaths, and plow forward, Mr. Two Metres.
The only debate is whether on not the researchers actually qualify for an Ignoble prize for their research. When masculinity is threatened, men will engage in certain behaviors to reaffirm that they are “real men.”? And Trumpets are doing this? Yeah they are. Very possibly Ignoble material in a smarter world.
Mreh. I must have a little extra testosterone floating around as I feel like competing against someone. Up for a Metamucil drinking contest? Grin.