you have no data to even support that idea.. its been done for us... here are graphs that are excellent mapping the changes. And the author makes some interesting neutral conclusions about CO2 and falling temps. http://icecap.us/images/uploads/CO2,Temperaturesandiceages-f.pdf
moronically oversimplified drive-by thingies like that are what appeal to the hysterical environuts... Our earth can obviously compensate for greenhouse gasses, it's been belching them out since it's beginnings. Mankind is adding a small fraction of what earth produces and earth is compensating for it... earth compensated for krakatoa!! I'm an engineer and had philosophy 101, you morons can't put that shit past me...
Ummmm, no. Man has increased the CO2 levels by 35% over natural levels. Not volcanoes. That's a provable fact. The extra CO2 is from man. We know this by isotope analysis and simply by doing the math on how much we have burned in the last 150 years. The fact is that CO2 in the atmosphere increases temps. It has in the past and it's doing it now. It really is that simple. There is virtually no disagreement on that fact among climatologists.
I disagree. If the level of CO2 is constant, and all other variables are held constant, will there be warming (assuming equilibrium has already been reached)? If the level of CO2 is increased, and all other variables are held constant, will there be warming?
Warming preceeds the increase in CO2. You can prove this in the lab. All of the temp data in the past via ice core samples shows that temps rise well before an increase in CO2. In fact the same ice core data shows a sharp plunge in temps AFTER CO2 increases.