"Inflation has risen largely due to transitory factors" -- J. Powell

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Scataphagos, Apr 28, 2021.


  1. Two different friends went to Home Depot and the price of wood practically doubled. PE waxes and resins have seen a surge in raw material costs due to shortages (some refineries have not been able to produce as much and demand has spiked). Wood costs is mostly inland transportation but also a surge in demand as people are doing more building and construction too.. It will keep going like this for several months.
     
    #11     May 20, 2021

  2. With logistics costs, it is affecting everyone across the board so competitiveness does not matter when everyone is raising prices. It is not 100% the reason for the inflation but the reason why it is so large and looks seasonal. Deflation is not coming because the cost to bring things in is still so high and demand is 3x or 4x what it was last year during COVID..... every market I serve is seeing demands like never before so there is no need to lower prices.
     
    #12     May 20, 2021

  3. Look at COSCTO water... was like $2-$3 for their large case of kirkland water and now it is $4 - $6. Not a big deal since that is still cheap for 36 or 40 bottles of water but water is not more expensive totally...... shipping is.
     
    #13     May 20, 2021
    jem likes this.
  4. UsualName

    UsualName

    Ok. We’ll see soon enough.
     
    #14     May 20, 2021

  5. There are other factors playing into inflation such as the market surge and labor market coming back and economy chugging along but in the immediate short term the spike in supply chain costs is going to raise prices on everything everywhere and it already started at the end of Q1 and shows no signs of slowing down all year.
     
    #15     May 20, 2021
  6. virtusa

    virtusa

    shipping.jpg
     
    #16     May 29, 2021
    El OchoCinco likes this.

  7. Yup... people think I am exaggerating but there is a price increase surge coming down through the supply chain since March and it is going to lead to some significant short-term inflation.

    It startedd in SEPT - NOV when economies started opening up and the demand for the XMAS season put a strain on space and equipment but that was not filtering down. BUt since March......freight rates alone to the U.S. from Asia which were $3000 a container are hitting $12,000 a container in June. That is a huge meatball that is no longer being absorbed but being passed on from importer to distributor to supplier to customer.

    I am in the import export biz and this is expected to stay tight until 1Q 2022....
     
    #17     May 29, 2021
  8. [​IMG]

    Started getting higher after November really...

    The below chart is Asia to Brazil which grew 250% but this same surge is happening ASIA to U.S. and Latin America.

    [​IMG]
     
    #18     May 29, 2021
  9. Arnie

    Arnie

    Maybe it's not so "transitory"

    Economic growth projections signal multiyear container shipping upturn

    ...

    But what about demand? Looking at the past decade after the financial crisis, global container demand has grown basically in line with global economic growth as measured by GDP. Looking at any individual year, such a link is not always very accurate — and tends to fluctuate quite a bit — but seen over a longer time span, the growth trends match relatively well. In the “old days,” there was a multiplier effect driven by the waves of outsourcing and the containerization process itself, but that effect basically came to a natural conclusion more than a decade ago.

    Given this link between the global economy and the container trade and the latest GDP data from the International Monetary Fund in its April 2021 World Economic Outlook, we can project global container volumes to grow approximately 18 percent from 2021 to 2024.

    In other words, demand will still grow faster (18 percent) than capacity (14 to 15 percent) over the next several years.

    Let us not forget that in this period, we will also see vessels scrapped to make way for newer, larger, more efficient ships. A container vessel typically has a lifespan of 25 years. Simplistically, this should imply a 4 percent demolition rate per year, but that would be misleading, as old vessels are also relatively small. It is therefore more reasonable to expect a 1 to 2 percent scrapping rate in terms of actual capacity. But even using the lower value of only 1 percent scrapping would lead to a net fleet growth of just 10 percent in the near term against demand growth of 18 percent.

    Hence, what the numbers are telling us “co-drivers” is that around the curve, we are looking into a market in which demand is growing faster than capacity, indicating a cyclical upturn. The carriers could, of course, start to order even more vessels, but anything ordered now won’t be delivered until late 2023 at the earliest. That signals a strong market in favor of the carriers for at least the next couple of years, unless demand growth falters significantly, which is unlikely given expected global economic growth

     
    #19     May 29, 2021
  10. Snarkhund

    Snarkhund

    Port of Los Angeles has not managed to clear the ships anchored outside the harbor and say they only have 2 gangs per ship. The union there is going to train up a bunch of people to skilled positions. Opportunity of a lifetime for some of those people to make good money.

    Oakland is screwed more than any other port on the west coast. They won't be able to clear the backlog before the seasonal increase and its going to be a real mess there. They are also understaffed and hiring.

    As mentioned, increased fees will be passed onto to consumers but you can't deliver products when you don't have parts so expect some products to be unavailable this summer. Things are supposed to recover in the fall.

    Its gonna be a long, hot and expensive summer. I happen to believe in the pent-up-demand theory so the inflation contribution from this sector is going to be significant.
     
    #20     May 29, 2021