Indiana's Evan Bayh to retire from Senate

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CaptainObvious, Feb 15, 2010.


  1. "..From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs......"

    Karl Marx, 1875
     
    #41     Feb 17, 2010
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    *shrug*

    That's the economic system of the typical family.
     
    #42     Feb 17, 2010
  3. I agree, and it is usually an act of free will and kindness.

    Socialism / Marxism is kindness demanded through force of law.

    Big difference, in my opinion.
     
    #43     Feb 17, 2010
  4. obama is now asking reps to "come on down" and let's talk.....what a joke..once he realized that the american avg joe had seen thru closed door and the foot thick ponzi scheme, it was all over for him..now he is begging...Mother May I? start over, please. " I promise the tv's will be there fulltime" Losing Ted's seat was the clincher for mr big ears. He then realized that he was still the chosen one and could say that ted's seat was only lost because folks are mad at everybody and the dummies known as american taxpayers would shut their stupid mouths. Remember wright said the rich americans white folks are the enemy of all, .......if u do not believe that go to the mission statement of the church he headed and obama attended for 20 years. Their mother country is not usa but africa........go to their website........Well, everybody is not running the show. The dems are from stem to stern. Running the show into the ground, while dummy us says "I thought he said the change would be good for us, not bad". The AGNOSTIC one IS AMONG US...He will tax the devil out of anything of value...When the women swooned and screamed when he blew his nose, the beauty of the chosen one was then confirmed....As Hillary said, '"the heavens parted and he descended".....many dozens of times as he flits all over the world and country trying to save his lowlife buddies. Parting the skies with the Air Force 1 as he lands every couple of days somewhere, yes, tight belts, you all.
     
    #44     Feb 17, 2010
  5. Ricter

    Ricter

    Force of law demands distribution in that scenario, and force of law protects accumulation in our scenario. Either end can be taken to an immoral extreme. We are not in danger of the former, not anywhere near. The claim of some "socialist" agenda is just a diversion--and in his case probably unwitting.
     
    #45     Feb 17, 2010
  6. Therein lies the debate.
     
    #46     Feb 17, 2010
  7. The irony is that in every debate in every form of media between every participant bar none the debate is over money in its various forms.

    There is no amount of money, real, printed, or otherwise that can satisfy the Global debt which is outstanding. And there is no amount of realistic growth that can be generated with which to satisfy the sovereign debt outstanding in the world.

    There is only repudiation. The faux partisan fights are the real joke.


     
    #47     Feb 17, 2010
  8. bighog

    bighog Guest

    It took Bill Clinton a couple years to get his "sealegs" in Washington D C. Once Bill caught on how the game was played he drove the Republicans up a wall.

    I will stick with Obama and hope he gets some more guts and fights back instead of being the nice guy he really is.

    I do not blame some Democrats for throwing in the towel and saying enough of this bullshit.................we have a job to do but one side insists on being the party of "NO" and relish in the thought of a failed Presidency so they could get back into power to run the country into another economic trainwreck just like Hoover and Bush did. Nothing like taking care of a few friends in Corporate America and Wall-Street, that is the Republican party. Privatise the profits from screwing the public and socialise the losses when the gig blows up..........that is the Republican party.

    I am so discusted with the Republican party i do not argue anymore about politics. It is a waste of time and effort. If more Dems quit, more power to them. I mean lets elect Newt Gingridge and a loser like sarah palin and be done with it. :eek:

    PS: you see...........once Newt and that fruitcake broad get elected............we can move to Canada or New Zealand. :)
     
    #48     Feb 17, 2010
  9. I don't think the abortion debates are about money, nor some of the other religious based positions of the right wing...they are about what the right thinks is moral based on their fundamentalist thoughtless and programming of their take on the Bible.

    How they perverted the message of Jesus to somehow come up with greed/capitalism is above the message of Christ...is well, must be the work of the devil...

     
    #49     Feb 17, 2010
  10. Now let's look at that ignorant Bible comment. The Holy Bible over and over says men on men is sin, bigtime. Cannot make it anything else. Killing babies is a sin of all sins. This is not right wing view of Bible this is fact of life. Those 2 abominations are in the platform of the Democrat party...irrefutable..they will defend them to the end.....teddy leaves us his seat is grabbed bigtime.....wow and wow

    ..How about the genius move to Nukes power.??? r u kidding...mr big ears is groping now at anything the taxpayer will buy, which is nothing now.....notice the gray hair .....he is in so deep over his abilities, it is scary......
     
    #50     Feb 17, 2010