See that graph... that is co2 act as one of the most efficients coolants in the atmosphere. How do I know? Its a NASA experiment...and this is what the scientists say.. “Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.” http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ In short... if you claim co2 is not cooling then you are claiming co2 is not warming.
Those charts do not show "cooling", they show high altitude CO2 absorbing energy from collisions with energetic particles which would otherwise fry us all. As was explained by Anthony Watts, of wattsupwiththat.com (you've heard of the site?), in response to this very assertion of yours. You are misreading and misunderstanding what NASA is reporting.
Didn't we do this already a few times... how many times are you not going to engage on the science instead of saying Watts says without a link? Here is the NASA quote... I think you need to click the link and read it on the post HANSEN NASA website. Quote from NASA -- "Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space." http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ So what exactly are you saying Watts is saying? do you have a link cause I doubt he is overruling the experiment... don't you... this is real science.
In the 21st century, greenhouse gases have continued to accumulate in the atmosphere, just as they did in the 20th century, but global average surface air temperatures have stopped rising in tandem with the gases. The temperature of the top half of the world's oceans -- above the 1.24-mile mark -- is still climbing, but not fast enough to account for the stalled air temperatures. http://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/octo...th-s-ocean-abyss-has-not-warmed/#.VDRDq_ldVcQ thanks for pointing that out. wtd2.
I not only posted the link to his article, but even quoted part of it. And you replied to it repeatedly.