Incompetent People Too Ignorant to Know It

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Lornz, Mar 15, 2012.

  1. Rob227

    Rob227

    You had a chance to explain your cosmic radiation theory, and supply any supporting evidence. You chose not to.

    If that shows that you are knowledgeable and full of clues then while others aren't then ok, be happy believing that.
     
    #121     Mar 20, 2012
  2. Rob227

    Rob227

    Another expert on knowledge and common sense that has nothing intelligent to add about the actual topic.

    I could respond in a similar fasion but why bother, I didn't come here for that.

    You've already shown that you are in the category of being unable to reassess your own opinion because when that opinion was challenged you became agitated then dismissed everything I said rather than thinking about it. Now you have just degenerated to a level of petty comments that have nothing to do with the subject.

    Anyway, the rest of the posts can speak for themselves and let others judge them how they may.
     
    #122     Mar 20, 2012
  3. It's nice to see someone else for a change argue for the rational side about AGW. Thanks Rob.

    It's quotes like this, from presumably intelligent people that make one shake their head. I mean, there isn't one thing that could be remotely considered a fact here......except maybe that "he" sees no consensus.

    "AGW people speak of this nonexistent consensus. I see no consensus, I see a deeply divided scientific community with AGW proponents falsifying data and data products routinely.

    There is no consensus."


    I find it both fascinating and frustrating this phenomena of non-stupid people being so entrenched into their ideology and ego that they cannot see "over there". They post stuff from Watts, who is a paid shill meteorologist for the oil companies and ignore the other 99% of the huge volume of science and opinion on the matter. They repeat stuff that has been dis-proven. They think somehow all the world's climatologists falsify data and ignore their integrity to push.... bad news?

    Were someone like 377 to change his mind after a new look at the data and say he was wrong, I for one would have huge respect for him. But that won't happen. He may say he is smart, and he may be smarter than me, but his statements and intransigence on this topic just make him look stupid. There is no other way to say it. A closed rigid mind can never yield wisdom.
     
    #123     Mar 20, 2012
  4. Eight

    Eight

    we get it, private sector money is tainted but public sector money is pure... private sector research is biased but public sector research is straight science.. LOL!

    Hee hee, the public sector is so pure that they can't pay their credit card minimums without borrowing more.. I'm thinking that your era of purity is looking at it's own demise and not getting it. Talk about too ignorant to recognize it, wow...

    Ooooohhh, let's all bow down to our god Science! Science is pure because it's not tainted with that private sector money!!
     
    #124     Mar 20, 2012
  5. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    I said that there isn't a consensus. A random link found on google doesn't make something a consensus.



    No, I think *some* climatologists falsify data and data products in order to push their point of view. They possess no scientific integrity.



    I don't give fuck if I have your respect or not. My beliefs are what they are. Do you think my core beliefs vary depending on who will respect me in P&R? Do liberals know what a core belief is?




    Show me one post where I said I was smart.

    I'm seeing a pattern here with you that I've seen with others.

    You are becoming obsessed with me. I mean obsessed in the sense that you are dwelling on my words disproportionately over the words of others. Why are my statements more important than statements made by other people posting in here?

    The last guy who became obsessed with me got a permanent vacation from ET. Don't be that guy.
     
    #125     Mar 20, 2012
  6. Hombre have a few others things going against him. So don't claim credit where no credit is due.

    You went so far as to crawl under a rock when I was hammering away at you, and we are both still here.

    Just thought I would pop that little bubble of yours, and btw, welcome back to the arena:)
     
    #126     Mar 20, 2012
  7. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    RCG, as far as I am concerned you are just a batshit crazy enema nurse will delusions of grandeur.

    You are another obsessive person who needs professional help. What you believe or don't believe isn't something that concerns me. Your life as an african-american has left you traumatized so you run around in here noting every slight like Rainman and behave like a small dog nipping at heels.
     
    #127     Mar 20, 2012
  8. Brass

    Brass

    Rest easy, RCG. 377OHMS is just one more among many incompetent people here too ignorant to know it. They're always the last to know.
     
    #128     Mar 20, 2012
  9. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    We know you are Queen of the Fag-Hags and mindless Sniper-in-Chief but many of us wonder why you have a new account every 6-months. Is it because you've been banned repeatedly?

    I would think you'd have gotten the message but I guess its more economic for you to get abuse here than to patronize the S&M parlor in your apartment block.
     
    #129     Mar 20, 2012
  10. Brass

    Brass

    No, really. What's on your mind?
     
    #130     Mar 20, 2012