Once again - We have caught Tsing Tao posting so many charts he found now with fake data -- where the chart had notations that it came from John Hopkins, etc. When we actually pulled the raw data from John Hopkins we find the chart is completely fake. Of course the charts came from Twitter feeds of COVID denier which he knows are such nonsense he refuses to provide the source. Your chart is hosted on the photo sharing site -- it is not sourced from the Financial Times website. Find us the chart sourced directly on the Financial Times website (or the mainstream media article hosting it) -- otherwise you have no believability. (EDIT - I see you posted the FT link. GOOD) I can easily photoshop a chart I create to show "Financial Times" in the lower right hand corner. Even easier to post it to some photo sharing website.
GO TO THE CHART YOURSELF. THE LINK IS BELOW. https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-chart...&per100K=1&startDate=2020-03-01&values=deaths
https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-chart...&per100K=1&startDate=2020-03-01&values=deaths https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-chart...&per100K=1&startDate=2020-03-01&values=deaths
So what's your point? That you're unable to compare Sweden to its direct neighbors like a real scientist would do. https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-chart...&per100K=1&startDate=2020-03-01&values=deaths https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-chart...&per100K=1&startDate=2020-03-01&values=deaths
gwbe-isfullofshit. He has posted at least 50 charts without giving the link. For instance a few months back he posted a chart in which he and a lying pieces of shit media source pretended Sweden had the highest (worst) rate for deaths or something in the world at that time. The chart the liar used was a one week chart.... gwBe- refused to provide the link so we could put it in context and show the mis representation.
I think gwb-trading is suggesting that if you posted a chart with the source info not shown (see edited chart example of your chart below) and then if he ask you the source (a link) of your chart... You then refuse to reveal that source / link as the other poster had refused to reveal the source...the chart then becomes questionable. P.S. I'm not sure if gwb had eventually figure out on his own it was a chart from a twitter person that's anti-covid or Tsing tao eventually coughed up the source info. wrbtrader
Wow!! Gwb: The chart is fake. Me: That data is real from a trustworthy source with link and proof. Gwb is proven wrong. Gwb: What about this other chart? Are you really incapable of an objective opinion? Do you ever admit that you were wrong even after unequivocally being proven wrong? Does this not illustrate that you have an extreme bias and that anything that you post wrt Covid should be completely dismissed by everyone?
In each and every instance Tsing Tao refused to cough up the source and we had to go hunt down the source of the fabrications ourselves.
It was obvious that he was hiding the source of the info although I don't know why when he's been open about being a Covid denier. Simply, it was a strange behavior although I could only see your response via your questioning about such. At first, I thought you were in an argument with Jem until I logged out and saw whom you really were debating with. It's something I've seen done here at ET by other Covid deniers...why do they hide their source when question after they've been public about their different beliefs about Covid... Unless wrbtrader
Has anyone noticed that wrbtrader always put's his nick at the end of his posts? You know why he does that? For free advertising, that's why. He knows people will google his nick and his website comes up at the top. He's getting free advertising here at ET off of Baron and he knows it. He's even talked about it on his website. And I can prove it.