So it starts again --- "You post some chart claiming it is the truth without any attribution or proof."
Almost, but I'll post how it actually happens: I post some chart - many times just showing the chart itself with no commentary, but sometimes providing commentary. In any case, my posting is indication that the position is something I support (otherwise, I'd probably not have posted it). You don't hunt anything down except to dig up dirt on the author of the post. You never attempt to refute the data presented, preferring the easier sleazier way of just slandering the author in an attempt to discredit the post. You never discredit the post, because you lack the skills to do so, and because the posts are usually factually accurate - it's just that you don't like them. The source isn't revealed to be crap or nonsense, but you try to find dirt on them and challenge other posts of theirs that could be BS or not (I don't know, not supporting those posts) and use it as a way to make ALL posts someone says as wrong. And I always, every time, provide a link to my posts when they come from an external source. Every. Single. Time.
What is the source of the chart -- provide the url of the blog or website the chart is posted on --- so we can see the complete context. You claim - "And I always, every time, provide a link to my posts when they come from an external source. Every. Single. Time." Well provide one now for this chart.
you mean so you can find out who posted the chart and all the dirt on that person, research everything they ever tweeted and - without actually addressing the chart at all - discredit it? the source of the data is on the bottom of the chart. all you want to do is see who posted it. You've used github before as a source.
The scriblings on the chart are not from the NY Times github location. Provide the source of the chart in context of where it is posted (the url of the website) with the scriblings if you want to demonstrate any credibility. The url of the image your posted is from pbs.twimg.com - pbs.twimg.com subdomain is Twitter's image-hosting domain --- So obviously this chart came from some bullshiat Tweet from a clown.
The scriblings on the chart are not from the NY Times github location. Provide the source of the chart in context of where it is posted (the url of the website) with the scriblings if you want to demonstrate any credibility. The url of the image your posted is from pbs.twimg.com - pbs.twimg.com subdomain is Twitter's image-hosting domain --- So obviously this chart came from some bullshiat Tweet from a clown. Which demonstrates once again why your are unwilling to provide the source -- you know it is a crap source.
I just typed in the link. Goes right to the CSV file. https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/blob/master/us-counties.csv Please tell me what data is incorrect. you can't, so you're trying to discredit the source.
Stop pushing nonsense --- the source of your image is https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EueNxK5VkAEvfg7?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 The url of the image your posted is from pbs.twimg.com - pbs.twimg.com subdomain is Twitter's image-hosting domain --- So obviously this chart came from some bullshiat Tweet from a clown. Which demonstrates once again why your are unwilling to provide the source -- you know it is a crap source.