Continually? Please show me how many times I have pushed a point from someone pushing "demon sperm", as an example. Please also provide the last time this occurred. if it is more than 2 times, or in the last few months, I'll paypal you $50 right now. If you can show me JUST ONE time I supported using bleach as a medical remedy for ANYTHING, I'll paypal you $500 right now. if not, you do the same for me. Deal? And the post where I posted - without comments - the tweet from the group of doctors (one of which made the comment about Demon Sperm) it was about HCQ, and that was ALL. Or you can stop totally fabricating falsities and making shit up to slander someone who continues to make you look like the horse's ass you are. How about I start pointing out how you support Child Molestation in your posts? Total bullshit, but if that's going to be your game, why not?
Good luck with your fantasies.... go back and read all the nonsense you pushed from Jennifer Cabrera and the Rational Ground clowns.
Can't provide any examples, can you. Good luck with your support of guilty child molesters. That's really disgusting.
Over and over again I have provided examples of your posts from Jennifer Cabrera and these sources. Why don't you stick with mainstream news and science sources rather than crap posted by people in blogs and twitter.
Over and over you've provided the one example of the one time I posted something from Jennifer Cabrera, and her point was a valid one that - to this day - you haven't been able to refute. Instead, you point out other points from her I don't agree with and say because I supported the one point that you can't refute, I support everything she has ever said. Meanwhile you post dozens of different threads over the last few years of all the child molesters who should have been pardoned. You're a sicko.
There are plenty of examples of you promoting nonsense from people from Twitter or in Blogs. The one example that you are referencing is Jennifer Cabrera promoting fake death data from the state of Florida in an attempt to help DeSantis promote COVID is harmless-- her nonsense is completely refuted. If you want any credibility, why don't you stick with mainstream news and science sources rather than crap posted by people in blogs and twitter. So the DeSantis Administration invites a COVID denier blogger to review non-public state data (which Florida refuses to share with university medical researchers) so they can create anti-lockdown, "COVID is harmless" propaganda. Once the COVID denier advocate publishes complete nonsense - DeSantis' spokesperson and his allies push the nonsense on their Twitter accounts. ‘It’s crap’: DeSantis office ‘leaks’ state records to fuel COVID-19 death ‘conspiracy’ https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/desantis-for-the-win.345108/page-218#post-5246053
Just because you think something I post is nonsense doesn't make it so. You're the authority on absolutely nothing, and plenty of times you've made up shit along the way. And posting a link to a previous post where you've made this same argument before (and were refuted as well) doesn't help your case. Because lots of times mainstream news is just as bad as blogs and lots of times blogs have better quality news than the MSM. Only Party Loyalists like yourself believe otherwise. Good little soldier. Is that why someone tried to doxx you once?
That might make a difference if, you know, masks stop viruses from virusing. They don’t. and it doesn’t excuse an overreaching government mandate from forcing you to do it.
Could be taken as evidence of either way, thought wouldn't explain why there was a second spike during mask mandates being ON. Tsing Standard Disclaimer: I am posting this chart for its informational purpose only, I do not support or endorse the data in this chart - I did not create it. I do not know the creator, I do not support his/her sports teams, or encourage following him/her for their dietary wisdom or knowledge on any topic at all. All similarities between people living and dead are coincidental and unintentional. Void in Maine and Vermont and wherever prohibited by law.
So let's discuss your usually procedure for pushing your "facts". You post some chart claiming it is the truth without any attribution or proof. We hunt down the chart on the Internet and see that it came from some questionable blogger or twitter account. The source is revealed as complete crap and nonsense -- which is why you don't provide an attribution or url with the source. This happened with the Jennifer Cabrera nonsense and many other examples. If you want any credibility, why don't you stick with mainstream news and science sources with proper attribution rather than crap posted by people in blogs and twitter -- especially since you know upfront it is such crap that you don't provide any attribution or link.