I just said this. Do you actually read the posts you reply to? I get that you're in a rush to spam the latest article your bot finds for you, but really. Slow down. It's not meaningless. It shows trends for out weeks and direction. Its only meaningless to people who don't like what the data is showing. Like you.
And yet you quote ‘highest death total from Jan to June in 150 years’. What does that even mean? You are completely inconsistent
I’ve read it. Did you see that by November, Sweden was on pace for average death totals for the year?? Oh right - you did - and then told us this data was of no merit. “The November figures seems less alarming when adjusted for the growing size of the Swedish population. On a per capita basis, November was only the deadliest in a decade, with 77.9 people dying per 100,000 inhabitants, compared to 79.2 in November, 2010.” https://www.thelocal.se/20201214/sweden-sees-highest-excess-mortality-in-100-years WITH NO MASKS AND NO LOCKDOWN. Sweden was supposed to have hundreds of thousands of deaths. You continue to root for it. But What happened? virus gonna virus Sweden is the model
Long live the King... https://www.marketwatch.com/story/e...tegy-has-failed-11608220615?mod=mw_latestnews "...‘I think we have failed. We have a large number who have died and that is terrible. It is something we all suffer.’" That’s Sweden’s King Carl XVI Gustaf admitting to state broadcaster SVT in an annual broadcast that his country’s anti-lockdown coronavirus strategy has failed, amid a higher rate of infections than its Nordic neighbors Finland and Sweden... Bad misstep there in the article though, by the author on the underlined bit. I'm sure "Lina Sigol" meant to type "...neighbors Finland and Norway". But I digress.
You have not established that Sweden is reporting deaths more slowly than all the other countries. Sweden simply does its accounting differently. Instead leaving all the deaths batched together they breakout them out and reconcile them to the correct day of death. How many times do you need to read that before you understand that does not mean that Sweden is slower in reporting deaths. 2. When sweden had zero and one death a day... I did seize on that data. When the deaths started rising I quickly stopped making that argument because you could see the trend rising on the 7 day line. You were the moron who was thinking that a report of x amount of deaths in one day meant that Sweden had reached 7 week highs in deaths. that was not true... because you misunderstood how the official website recorded deaths. You have been a moron for months on this stuff.
This circle jerk between you 2 has been going on since March, time for both of you to give it a rest. Cady women and Juveniles don’t beat the band this long.
Yeah, the US should use South Korea's response as an example. I mean its chart illustrating daily new cases looks nothing like that chart in the US. https://www.statista.com/chart/21674/new-outbreaks-south-korea-china/ Korea's Third Wave Still Unbroken