In Rand Paul's world, does a private doctor get to refuse treatment to a black man?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, May 23, 2010.

  1. Go ahead, try that scenario...see what happens...

     
    #81     May 25, 2010
  2. What Rand, and some others seem to miss is that, there is not a single piece of legislation( particularly when it comes to ethnics), that has not needed to be enforced at the point of a bayonet, either fiscal or actual.

    Government HAD to step in because most of the people either lacked the will or the courage to change for the better, as well as more than a few who didn't think that civil rights was a better thing.

    There are still people today, with a sitting African-American president who are talking about people without property being disenfranchised.

    The descendants of the Confederacy just never got over that loss. Understandable considering they were winning most of the time, but the facts are that they lost, and the South will not rise again.
     
    #82     May 25, 2010
  3. Oh, it would not go well, but it wouldn't be nearly as bad as if you got caught practicing your beliefs about pedophilia. LOL!!! LOL!!!

     
    #83     May 25, 2010
  4. In fact, it was "states rights" that effectively destroyed reconstruction. They held that line until Tennessee gentleman Andrew Jackson put an end to it at the federal level.

    Pure Libertarianism will not work, it will be reduced to warlords and fiefdoms. Government has to enforce the greater good of the nation from time to time.
     
    #84     May 25, 2010
  5. Hmm, well libertarianism sure did do a good job of taking the USA from undeveloped wilderness to the largest economic, academic, scientific, military, and cultural power in the world in a few centuries of existence... But NOW for some reason it wouldn't work.

     
    #85     May 25, 2010
  6. Yep, another confirmation that education here is in decline. I said PURE libertarianism, and even went on to say why.

    Thanks for playing tho.
     
    #86     May 25, 2010

  7. I see that this little piece of info has been avoided
    :D
     
    #87     May 25, 2010
  8. Libertarianism on the back of slaves, no rights for women, Chinese labor, killing native Americans, child labor...

    You are one lunatic crazed person if you think America was libertarian for all Americans...

    It is a bit like saying the lords in England had a libertarian existence...because they didn't have to answer to anyone...

     
    #88     May 25, 2010
  9. And, btw, libertarianism is when everyone gets to play. Lets see now, since 1776.........
     
    #89     May 25, 2010
  10. I see 777 beat me to it, oh well, since you prolly need to see this twice anyways:D :D
     
    #90     May 25, 2010