In Rand Paul's world, does a private doctor get to refuse treatment to a black man?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, May 23, 2010.

  1. So you are saying that you are anti constitution... Well, at least you are honest about that much.

     
    #101     May 25, 2010
  2. Change your soiled diapers, and try again...

     
    #102     May 25, 2010
  3. Actually Rand said that racism is not acceptable under any circumstances. Rand's position is that is that it's not the government's place to tell people what to think or dictate who people must do business with.

     
    #103     May 25, 2010
  4. Says the guy who starts 20 threads a week whining and obsessing about Rand Paul. LOL!!!!!

     
    #104     May 25, 2010
  5. Nah, the American and French revolutions are the birth of classical LIBERALISM.

    Thanks again for playing.
     
    #105     May 25, 2010
  6. Do you remember the famous saying of the Musketeers?

    "All for one, and one for all."

    The Libertarians creed?

    "All for me, and me for me."

     
    #106     May 25, 2010
  7. And for phenomena and some others I trot the elephant out again.

    No one will touch this, will they:D
     
    #107     May 25, 2010
  8. Yep, I do.

    It aint their fault 777, too much Limbaugh:)
     
    #108     May 25, 2010
  9. You know, their fictional hero is Jabba the Limbaugh...the ultimate narcissist.

    <img src=http://www.rackjite.com/graphics/rushjabba.jpg>

     
    #109     May 25, 2010
  10. PatternRec

    PatternRec Guest

    Or if you know what you are talking about, simply answer the question.

    Which title of the Civil Rights Act would your scenario fall under? And why?

    Saying, "go ahead see what happens" is useless grandstanding.
     
    #110     May 26, 2010