No crime is needed to impeach a president; an no, I'm not admitting no crime was committed here you are mistaken; plenty of us voted in record numbers to hold a rampant executive accountable. Our only concern is them taking forever to do so.
That's true, but there's no way they'll get the 2/3 super majority they need in the Senate to remove him if they don't prove a crime was committed. Democrats are playing a dangerous game here. They'll increase the odds of Trump winning a second term if this is ultimately unsuccessful.
Removal will be unsuccessful there's no doubt about it, of that much, we can agree on, regardless if a crime is proven to have been committed.
So why are we wasting our f'ing time when the infrastructure is crumbling and a trip to the Urgent-Care gets billed out at $1300 for a prescription for antibiotics to help with a sore throat? Because your boy Adam had his feelings hurt? Its f'ing stupid. Its fraud.
Here4Tards said that no crime is necessary, but it works the other way round too, eh? The fact that a crime may have been committed (just accepting that for the sake of argument) does not mean that it is in and of itself a high crime and misdemeanor requiring removal. Clinton committed a crime, yes? And it is not really up for debate because he plead guilty to it.