Impeachment 2.0

Discussion in 'Politics' started by gwb-trading, Jan 11, 2021.

  1. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    BTW I can't reply to your response in the other thread as Mirkin here asked for me to be banned. Can't reply to that thread for a week. Apparently politics is for the faint hearted.

    "in fact it said he was with his friends in a bar so wonder if he was drinking..." if he was with a guardian/close relative probably OK as long as a bar is considered private.

    Rittenhouse' father won't have been there as he was raised by his mom. Nobody to teach him to be a man, his prior behavior punching girls shows this.
     
    #141     Jan 14, 2021
    El OchoCinco, userque and Tony Stark like this.
  2. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    L-o-effing-L
    I could not agree more.

    He's on the TV like he's frigging poor.
    I mean he may be.... but that would suggest some extreme stupidity on his part.

    "We're all staying inside so get everything you’re entitled to.”
    “call the number on your screen now."
    "It’s free!”

    What's next?
    G. Gordon Liddy pitching gold for Rosalyn Capital?
    :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2021
    #142     Jan 14, 2021
    CaptainObvious likes this.
  3. Or any other old timer tell me about a reverse mortgage..
     
    #143     Jan 14, 2021
    Overnight and vanzandt like this.
  4. I am pretty sure that the price of silver is about to hit an all-time high.

    That same frigging ad has been running for ten years straight so it must be true.

    The thing that is bullshiite with that Joe Namath ad is that he says that "you are entitled to doctor's visits by telephone." WTF. What kind of "visit" is that?
     
    #144     Jan 14, 2021
    CaptainObvious likes this.
  5. virtusa

    virtusa

    If they don't neutralize Trump now it would be the biggest mistake the Republicans can make.
    Trump will terrorize all of them again.
     
    #145     Jan 15, 2021
    DiceAreCast likes this.
  6. userque

    userque

    That, and the results in Georgia, are part of the reasons Mitch greenlighted him. Imo.
     
    #146     Jan 15, 2021
    virtusa likes this.
  7. virtusa

    virtusa

    It would surprise me if the Republicans would not take care of the needed votes.
    They will wait till Trump is gone so that they don't have to kick him out as President.
    They will probably decide later who will have to vote for impeachment.
    Republicans will try to make sure Trump cannot go again for President, but they will do it in "hidden mode". And it creates opportunities for other President candidates.
    I also think that a lot of Republican voters (the silent majority) will not vote again for Trump if he would go for 2024.
    We did not see 74 million protesters, we saw only a few hundred. The rioters are not representative for all Republicans.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2021
    #147     Jan 15, 2021
    userque likes this.
  8. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    These two postings are diametrically opposed to one another. The author is all over the place and cannot have it both ways.
     
    #148     Jan 15, 2021
  9. virtusa

    virtusa

    NO not at all.

    First the large majority of "normal" Republican voters don't agree with the riots at Capitol Hill and the 5 deaths. This large majority did not go for the riots, they stayed home.

    Second, Trump could terrorize the party again. As voting is not anonymous he could punish those who voted against him, like he did before already. Neutralizing Trump would remove that risk.

    I cannot believe that the Republicans would be so stupid to help Trump to go for election in 2024 again. It would be the next disaster for them and for all Americans.
     
    #149     Jan 15, 2021
  10. Maybe they will have to take him to the vet and have him "neutralized."

    [​IMG]
     
    #150     Jan 15, 2021