Impeach OBAMA now!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by slapshot, Jan 28, 2009.

  1. softfx

    softfx

    I can't believe this shit !

    You fucking retard ! You don't even have a clue what a social democracy is.

    This country's left wing would be considered very much to the right, in Europe in general, and in Scandinavia in particular.

    Obama has been handed a ruined country - Ruined buy 8 years of very dangerous right-wingers warmongers and ideologues - ruined by your greedy corporate masters and bankers operating their major ass fucking on the masses from their penthouses overlooking central-park! It's not a cliché - They fucked it up big time, business cycle my ass .

    So while half of the country's population finally decided to make somewhat of a move and ask for something a little different - might work , might not, might be too late - but certainly worth a shot ...

    You ! What are you doing you brainwashed little fuck ?

    You are fucking whining ! With half the brain you have - WHINING Unfucking believable!

    Just go to the mall (I'm sure you know how to get there fast) go jerk-off your credit card and consume yourself to death you fucking inbred ...
     
    #21     Jan 28, 2009
  2. morganist

    morganist Guest

    no body is saying that the recession is obama's fault or that it wasn't made before him by right wingers.

    the claim made was that obama did not tell the truth about the plans in the bill passed. they were made out to be more related to infrastructure, which looking at the bill is not the case.

    i don't think that it is impeachment worthy but it does miss lead the country.

    the main problem is that it does not address the problem in full. also if he really wanted to change and if he could do it the steps he would have taken would have been more drastic.

    for example he could have brought sanctions against the banks and changed the financial system. instead he has just thrown money at the problem and kept a bad financial system. maybe he will do something but looking at previous governments if big change is likely it happens early, straight away.

    like i said brown and the boe controlling interest rates happened the instant they got in.
     
    #22     Jan 28, 2009

  3. Mandeldickhead,

    That's right, it was controversial on purpose. It was a social experiment, you moron.

    Do you ACTUALLY think that it was a serious call for impeachment? On E.T.???? I am laughing my ass off at you, boy.

    And you have greatly proved my theory that sheeple will respond emotionally, irrationally and stupidly to a headline without even bothering to see if the content is accurate or not. (it was/is factual about the stimulus bill).

    Rather than offer any contradictory argument about how/if the stimulus bill will actually help, you are still whining about Bush, etc. which was not even the topic! And spewing the same old left-wing party line vitriole without a shred of evidence to back it up.

    Instead, you initially responded with insults, abuse and your usual antisocial behavior.

    When you grow up to be a man someday, instead of acting like a pissy little girl hiding behind your e-mail, you'll realize that people can have opinions different from yours without you being so insecure that you have to attack them.

    I have watched you over the last year as you have been blathering insults and abuse at nearly everyone you come across. You are a very small person. This site was a lot better before you arrived and polluted every conversation.

    You have over 4,000 posts in one year, huh? That is the electronic equivelent of diarrhea of the mouth for rude little antisocials like you.
     
    #23     Jan 28, 2009
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    A distinct possibility given all of the demands for Bush's impeachment, right here on ET.
    :)
     
    #24     Jan 28, 2009
  5. No matter who was elected president, they would have a massive amount of critics and detractors at this point. That being said the man has been in office for less than a month!!

    The American people voted for him and the policies that he is pushing. The painful truth is that a majority of the electorate wants massive government intervention and an expanded welfare state. After the recent turmoil on wallstreet, many lost their faith in capitalism. The huge victory of the democrats, was a clear endorsement of socialism (which the Bush admin and wallstreet supported) over a freemarket system.

    It looks like the ET KKK wing is having a fit now, because there is a black president (that is why they cannot possibly stop themselves from using the deragatory and rascist language...which is absolutely pathetic), but its in the nations interest that he do well, otherwise we are all in trouble. The problems confronting the nation are way too serious for Obama to have a failed presidency. Rascist lack common sense, so of course they cannot understand that fact.
     
    #25     Jan 28, 2009
  6. Impeach obama?

    What good would it do, the twits biden, reid and peelosi would still be there .
     
    #26     Jan 29, 2009
  7. TGregg

    TGregg

    I don't think so.

    It's not. While Bush and the rest of the repbulicans have been giving the business to the citizens, The Obamassiah has broken spending records! It's big government on steroids - exactly what we've been voting for over the past couple decades.
    That would be GitMo and the defense budget.
    And Gay and transgender-partisan effort as well.
    Might as well rename the country to the People's Republic of America.
     
    #27     Jan 29, 2009
  8. Oh, they gave them "the business," all right. No argument there...
     
    #28     Jan 29, 2009
  9. The right wing wacko ET Klannish and their idea of an Obama impeachment:

    <img src=http://photosthatchangedtheworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/lynching-of-young-blacks.jpg>

     
    #29     Jan 29, 2009
  10. It's certainly not the fault of a "President" that spent OVER 500 days on VACATION at the Crawford Ranch, Kennebunkport, Maine and Camp David.

    He wasn't even around . . .
     
    #30     Jan 29, 2009