Immigrants Aim To 'Close' US Cities on May 1st

Discussion in 'Politics' started by capmac, Apr 28, 2006.

  1. Well....

    ...my lawn guy ..... and my pool guy....and my tree cutting service guy....and my housekeeper all showed up today.

    They hardly "shut down" Casa del Dr. Z.

    I may just cut their pay for good measure.

    :cool:
     
    #171     May 1, 2006
  2. Then when will they respect our viewpoints? When will they understand that they are not entitled to American benefits because they want better for themselves? When will YOU own up to the facts that they are illegal and must be dealt with?

    The flood gates for illegal entry must be closed. You can't keep burdening the taxpayers because YOU want to feel good about civil works. The fiscal pool is not unlimited, nor is the mass American public patience.

    In Dallas today there were a very few restaurants that closed because of not enough workers. The city has not received a major interruption at any level. I called a few friends in Chicago and the outcome was the same. One friend who is a reporter had is program director tell them to tight crop the shots as the crowd was nowhere near what they were expecting.

    They interviewed many folks, non-mexican, who were downtown and asked what they thought and overwhelmingly they stated that it was an insult that immigration wasn't in attendance in an enforcement capacity. And don't get me started about the attitude in the African American community. Notice that with the exception of a few rogue leaders (Jesse) you are not getting any feedback from our community. You wonder why? Support for the Mexican cause is almost down to the teens. And it's dropping!

    San Antonio? Volume does not make them legal! Why are you so opposed to them fixing their own homeland, and then staying there? It makes us all safer, and more humane. You can respect their viewpoints and also tell them that something is wrong with their concepts. But it does require major guts on your part. :)
     
    #172     May 1, 2006
  3. This is just too insane.

    If we cannot control our borders and immigration, then we are not a nation. The U.S. and every other country has a right to control immigration.

    The marches and the protests are ironic and really, really stupid.

    bt
     
    #173     May 1, 2006
  4. Bob111

    Bob111

    with all due respect you are wrong on this one-
    Which rights or freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights?
    Freedom of speech, Freedom of press, Freedom of religion

    Whose rights are guaranteed by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
    Everyone ( citizens and non-citizens living in the U.S. )


    http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/exec/natz/natztest.asp?FormMode=INPROCESS

    :D :D :D
     
    #174     May 1, 2006
  5. TGM

    TGM

    The Mexicans are here because the guys at the top want them here. When the bullets start flying --we will see how much the Democrats, Republicrats and the Corporats like bean burritos. This will split up the country. Bush thinks he can unite the US and Canada and Mexico into one block ---well the NWO is NOT working anywhere.

    As a trader --this will make the markets very rocky and profitable. As an American this is a disaster and the begining of a split up of the country. I have never seen so many Americans pissed off. Something will come out of it.
     
    #175     May 1, 2006
  6. No, they're wonderful and great....my boys in L.A. tell me that the traffic hasn't been as light since the '84 Olympics.

    Hell, I'm told all the rich MILFs are flooding Sunset and Ventura in celebration.

    VIVA la walkout!!!!!!!!!

    I say let’s make it a biweekly event.


     
    #176     May 1, 2006
  7. BSAM

    BSAM

    Yeah.....I'd heard this before. Can you direct me to the place in the Constitution where this is written? And if this is literally so, then a terrorist who walks across our border falls under the rights of our constitution, no?

    At any rate, I was speaking my opinion and the opinion of (most lilkely) the vast majority of legal citizens of the U.S. Thanks for your feedback.
     
    #177     May 1, 2006
  8. Dude,
    Here is some 3rd grade history for you. American Natives and Latinos are all the same just different tribes, i.e Mayas, Aztecas, Incas, Redskins...
    .

    From 1821 to 1877, there were two emperors, several dictators, and enough presidents and provisional executives to make a new government on the average of every nine months. Mexico lost Texas (1836), and after defeat in the war with the U.S. (1846–1848), it lost the area that is now California, Nevada, and Utah, most of Arizona and New Mexico, and parts of Wyoming and Colorado under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. In 1855, the Indian patriot Benito Juárez began a series of reforms, including the disestablishment of the Catholic Church, which owned vast property. The subsequent civil war was interrupted by the French invasion of Mexico (1861) and the crowning of Maximilian of Austria as emperor (1864). He was overthrown and executed by forces under Juárez, who again became president in 1867.
     
    #178     May 1, 2006
  9. volente_00

    volente_00


    Who ever said I was opposed to anything ? I am just stating facts. There is a right way and a wrong way. My relatives did it the right way. If they can, then others should too.


    What you see is supply and demand exhibited in a capitalistic economy.
     
    #179     May 1, 2006
  10. volente_00

    volente_00

    "This is a great revolution of the bronze race, the brown race," Marti Batres, Mexico City leader of the leftist Democratic Revolution Party, told a rally. "Our nation goes beyond the Rio Bravo (Rio Grande)," he said, noting that half of Mexico's territory became the western United States.



    Seems like my friends are not the only who share that view.
     
    #180     May 1, 2006