https://www.marketwatch.com/story/i...ys-cnbcs-becky-quick-2019-12-19?mod=home-page Like I've said before, I'm don't like to call tops. But everywhere in the media people are saying it's too easy to make money and now an anchor on CNBC admits to being a 100% in equities. Not quite red alert. But getting orange and deep orange now. Probably be another melt-up 1999 style before the real crash? What ya think?
Becky is a smart girl and I wouldn't bet against her... matter of fact myself have been all-in since around 2005, before which bonds actually provided reasonable yields. you need an accurate count of long/short among the dumb money.... individual stories like this are not indicators... there are indicators out there... google trends, twitter trends etc..
Sure. With hindsight. Depending where you are in your lifecycle, being a 100% in equities probably riskier for people already deep in their retirement. But OK for millenials. Just common sense.
Something is amiss... On air news people are limited in what positions they can personally hold, and most certainly not without a proper legal disclosure and disclaimer. I have never seen or heard a disclaimer from Becky Quick. I wonder if Warren gave her a share or two of BRK.A for being nice to him? Something is amiss!!
1-Haven't watched CNBC in years but employees weren't allowed to hold any individual stocks. 2-Warren is a nice guy, what's wrong with being nice to him in return?
I get your point. How bullish were these people a year ago when it really paid to be bullish? Trend still up for now!
warren is a bum? he's been market performing for a long time, 20 years? going around selling lunches for a living now.... value investing is long dead. but his long term views and perception of risk is still worth learning.
I try to read between the lines, yet still, can't grasp the idea. Can you expand a little bit ? Always open, for a new perspective.