Stupid question! I expected better from you Rearden. God is posited as a First Cause which means he is beyond time so nothing could have created Him or in other words, time is a creation of God.
If I had a $1 for each arrogant fool in this area I would be a very very rich man. And come to think of it I wouldn't do so bad on ET alone!
"The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike" Friedrich Nietzsche: Which is it, is man one of God's blunders or is God one of man's?
You see, folks, this is the real deal. The aptly named piker confuses his sophistry for critical thinking. Atheists don't have to pretend that no evidence exists that proves "God" exists when the pikers of the world can't supply any. To make matters much worse, they pretend that they have such evidence but consider providing it to atheists as "casting pearls before swine". Arrogance and stupidity in one package. How efficient of you, piker!
God would need existence to exist before god could exist as a first cause. Existence is posited as the irreducible principle, not god.