%% LOL exactly\ some times bit of fear can be a good thing. I'm afraid of trying to win a against a policeman or policeperson 's guns. Same with sheriff; both would be stupid losers game. A police-lady asked me once + i was bit nervous since she caught me speeedng ''do you have a gun/she saw my''NRA sticker I Vote'' /i told her politely NO \not on me/LOL HOWEVER if you saw 13 birds in a tree[say crows] a shot gun could get a bunch of them LOL Sorry trading+ nerves is so much harder than bird shooting. BUT strangely Market Makers Edge is 6 month chart; shoot for center mass maybe get 5 or 6 crows. Doves + quail turkeys are usually smarter than to roost5-6 in exact center mass. Billion buck Hedge Fundbook [by Larry Mint Hite] is decide what you '' can lose[or willing to lose''] NOT meaning you try to lose unless you are dumb enough to go against a sheriff + 5- 6 shooter or 14 shooter .Possible you could buy a big NY s island from Indians for peanuts Possible to buy AK oil wells[ +indian villiages for pennies per acre][edit/ history in hindsight best] An ETF / SPY or basket of oil stocks may do OK/ fine ; bird cr*p/pchicken cr*p, bull Cr*p, bat cr*p has done much better long term buys + sells than cryptoCr*p..................................................
This is like saying "Most people lose when they play against a pro basketball player, so maybe they should try to lose and then they'll win." It's obviously silly nonsense.
This is close to the only way what the OP wants to do is possible. It’s fear and greed that’s hurting them more than anything else. rather than a program that does/doesn’t invert your signal, you would want to have a program that does/doesn’t submit your inverted trade (and keep trading the way you are now)
What the OP does not realize is there are literally a million trades, entries and exits in a day. It is not really a matter of a handful being flipped or some other simple magical solution. The problem is selecting BETTER trades from that millions that are possible. He should focus on finding and executing better trades. Seriously, what good does it do to sample .00005% of the trades and say, "gee I should just flip them".
i think what got me thinking about the question in the first place was watching that movie on the plane (the parasite) - had been curious to see what the hype was after it won those awards a few years ago the plot veered a bit into the stuff of hyperbole (perhaps intentionally) but overall the takeaway - at least to me - was if the protagonist family did everything the opposite to what they actually did, they’d probably have ended up achieving what they wanted in the first place. not to psychianalyze too deep but I think like the family in that movie, for a significant portion of people the ‘need’ to make $$ crosses into a liability territory rather than an asset, which paradoxically makes it easier to get trapped into making bad decisions