You must believe that it would be proper for US soldiers to offer private security services for corporate and wealthy executives. The Democrats already hate executives. Anyways, most of the Blackwater are ex-soldiers. Both jobs are volunteer. Its Brutally unfair that Halliburton is making hundreds of billions of dollars off this Iraq war while soldiers coming home cant get the care they need[/QUOTE] Do you want the US army to build highways, schools, infrastructure, pipelines. The Army has said many times that there are few companies that can handle these projects in war zones. I suppose we could invite the Russians and Iran to do the job. [/QUOTE] 1.A money manger who gets a % of profits can file his gains as capital gains,although he had no risk.There are many other loop holes such as these Obama is trying to put a end to 2.Why does The US need to to build highways, schools, infrastructure, pipelines etc in Iraq ?Maybe because Bush destroyed them so that US taxpayers have to pay haliburten hundreds of billions to rebuild them . 3.Maybe the corporate and wealthy (haliburten)executives should pay for their own blackwater bodyguards while roaming the streets making estimates on how many billions they are going to charge the tax payer for their next project
You must believe that it would be proper for US soldiers to offer private security services for corporate and wealthy executives. The Democrats already hate executives. Anyways, most of the Blackwater are ex-soldiers. Both jobs are volunteer. Its Brutally unfair that Halliburton is making hundreds of billions of dollars off this Iraq war while soldiers coming home cant get the care they need[/QUOTE] Do you want the US army to build highways, schools, infrastructure, pipelines. The Army has said many times that there are few companies that can handle these projects in war zones. I suppose we could invite the Russians and Iran to do the job. [/QUOTE] Income is income is income: it should all be taxed at the same tax rates. No, we don't want soldiers, or Haliburton, building highways, schools, infrastructure, pipelines in Iraq. We didn't want those things, which existed before our invasion, destroyed IN THE FIRST PLACE. However, nothing would make more sense than to de-militarize those soldiers and employ them as civilians in building AMERICAN highways, schools, infrastuctue, and pipelines. And yes, Russia & Iran are welcome to do the rebuilding. American companies too if they are paid by the Iraqis.
A president of the United States should be chosen to be fitting and non controversial: Obama is mentally challenged w/ his retarded mind proven by his record 130 times votes present, very undecided; has terrorist ties to Bill Ayres; he is also a true manipulator, a flip flop on issues, stolen ideas and made it sounds like they were his own... and most importantly unreliable and can not be trusted. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122212856075765367.html?mod=djemEditorialPage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISRYDNvt_T0
The market will NEVER plunge to zero and the current pullback has nothing to do with Obama's upcoming landslide election. G. W. Bush's massive deficit spending is the cause of our problems if anything. Of course, it is most likely the undeniable, unpreventable reality of the business cycle.
4 more years of Bush would be better than 4 years of that lying MARXIST. He hasn't uttered a straight statement yet. In my opinion. As Ross Perot said " The devil is in the details."and we haven't heard any yet. Must be a reason. Probably The same reason the Democraps don't call themselves the Socialist party.
It's more like a crash than a "pullback". And while I don't "know" the decline is discounting a democratically controlled congress and an ultra liberal president. You don't know that it's not either.
You've just made what should be a 100% accurate prediction of the front page story in multiple mainstream media a week or so after he's inaugurated.