I tell you why. Because the only way to protect stupid and reckless people from doing harm to themselves and others is by forcing "life insurance" upon them. People all over on average behave much stupider than the normal distribution suggests.
Where is my choice when I received crappy service from airlines for decades while they sucked every single penny out of their aging fleet and poorly paid personnel to benefit shareholders and when times get tough they cry and my tax money is used to fix them up? Where are my choices when I am a responsible citizen and build a rainy weather cushion for me and my family by forgoing instant gratification but when times get tough my tax dollars are used to reward all those who made poor choices in life? Is that the individual responsibility you speak of? I don't see it anywhere. I only see entitled people who spend as if there is no tomorrow and when calamity hits they sit in the rain and beg for handouts. So their free choices are respected but I have to pay for their irresponsible life choices? That's hypocrisy, text book definition. It's much fairer to force irresponsible people to protect themselves and more importantly everyone else from their choices of overeating...subsequent obesity...stroke. Just one of million of examples. Choices come with consequences but one should not suck the benefits out of consequences and reject to pay for the cost of said consequences. Hope that makes it clear. Good night.
%% Sure is; $40,000,000 SEC fine may have helped him, even if it did not hurt him. I always assume any is taking his or her book. But different SEC rules/laws apply to directors+ such...................................................................................... The judge told mr Musk + SEC to work it out.
%% Send a thank you/Christmas card note to the bears that helped short DAL in to bankruptcy , since they deserved every downtic they got[edit And the long funds that sold the DAL longs]
If they are not doing anything to CZ Zhao for using Twitter to directly causing a bankruptcy of an entire company, they shouldn't do anything to Elon Musk that is assuming Twitter will still be functioning with the massive layoffs and the shutdown of offices due to the massive resignations on top of the layoffs. The last time that they try to punish Elon Musk for defending his company on Twitter against those shorts was I felt a bit draconian.
Never agreed to anything but whatever. To put me on Ignore, you don't really need a reason, a feigned reason especially. LOL