Now this gent sounds Jewish, must check if he was let go as his rating is excellent. https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/professor/2418919 He is listed in the staff directory but so is Helen. jeffrey.katz@qc.cuny.edu Could email him but that's a bit cheeky..
Odd, this is a grab of my CGPT prompt to check the rating earlier on. I saw 2.7, it saw 2.7. Well I'm not accusing you of ramming in some five stars But it's odd. As for my "precision" you see that I did check. The "would take again" is also way up. Perhaps a sheer coincidence reactive shift to repair fake negative reviews based on recent press? Randy Stein is also excellent.
Freed Israeli hostage says Hamas captors 'wanted Kamala to be elected,' were 'very scared' of Trump's return Israeli man held for 505 days in Gaza describes how US election affected his captivity
"The school “kept younger, non-Jewish educators with lower performance ratings,” Schwalb, 66, contended." Must be internal performance ratings of course. Also must have been a reactive sweep today to explain 2.7 but 3.5 is nothing to write home about and 66 is no spring chicken. Well, just have to wait for the case if it proceeds.
Let's see what the Rate My Professor website say about their rating scale. Can you explain the rating scale? When rating a professor, please refer to these definitions of Rate My Professors' ratings categories. Rate Your Professor: Overall Quality (Good: 3.5-5, Average: 2.5-3.4, Poor: 1-2.4) A professor's Overall Quality rating should reflect how well a professor teaches the course material, and how helpful they are both inside and outside of the classroom. Is the professor available for additional help after class or during office hours? Is the professor approachable, nice and easy to communicate with? https://help.ratemyprofessors.com/article/31-rating-scale Professor Helen Schwalb has had a 3.5 rating which is considered good -- but not in the high side of good obviously.
I expect the performance rating used by Queen College are not the ones on the Rate My Professor website. Normally the students at the end of a semester fill out a survey about their professor; the university is most likely using these internal, non-public ratings and any other performance review information the school administration generates.
These things are like Uber ratings, completely distorted so anything below say 4.8 starts to suck. Younger professors hustle to keep their ratings max, a 66 year old maybe not bothered to give their personal WhatsApp.