IBKR suddenly changed margin requirements?

Discussion in 'Interactive Brokers' started by manic, Feb 7, 2020.

  1. ids

    ids

    9% is the minimum rate for any ETF in IB. Most probably you become concentrated in one or two positions. This alternative margin test will set 30% rate for concentrated positions and 5% rate for the rest of the portfolio. Concentrated portfolio is something under your control and IB will not warn you about this change. As soon as your account become non-concentrated, you will see familiar rates again.
     
    #11     Feb 9, 2020
    MoreLeverage likes this.
  2. manic

    manic

    Thank you. This is what happened.

    Are IBKR's portfolio margin requirements similar to those of other brokers? For instance, do most of them have a 9% minimum, an average of roughly 15%, and a requirement of 25% for higher risk ETFs like junk bonds?
     
    #12     Feb 9, 2020
  3. qwerty11

    qwerty11

    Impossible. Every stock/ETF has a minimum of 15%, also the lowest risk categories like currency or bond ETF's.

    There are only a few exceptions for broad based / sectors. The lowest margin is:

    High-Capitalization Broad Based Indexes
    Market Move Range:-8% to 6%
    Indexes:
    • Broad Based Indexes
    • European Indexes
    • Growth Indexes
    • Value Indexes
    • Japan Indexes
    • FTSE 100 Index
    • S&P 500 Buy Write Index

    So that is 6% for long S&P500 but not for bond ETFs...
     
    #13     Feb 9, 2020
  4. qwerty11

    qwerty11

    Interesting info. The 30% for 2 largest / concentrated is is a known number but the 5% for the rest (in that scenario) is new info. That gives a better understanding of concentrated calculation...

    Note that on IB website also a minimum of 6% is mentioned for broad based. So I wonder if your 9% is correct:

    https://www.interactivebrokers.com/...0&pm=1&rst=101004100808#portfolio-margin-page
     
    #14     Feb 9, 2020
    MoreLeverage likes this.
  5. No, IB’s PM requirements are way better than most. Most others I’ve used or investigated are never lower than 15% (as IB is for larger ETFs), don’t have a risk offsetting system for crediting risk reduction on longs vs shorts, and have a much more limited set of “PM eligible” things (typically only large cap stocks and big ETFs). Ineligible stocks or ETFs would not get the 15% rate, but instead 30% might be typical, while perceived “higher risk” ones would be 50%+.

    That said, if you really want 15% on junk bonds, you might try talking to E*TRADE or TD Ameritrade to see if your favorite ETFs qualify for their 15% rate. Arguably IB is being overly conservative here, so you might find someone who will give you better than their increased 25% rate. You’d also want to factor in what margin rate you’d be paying into your calculations since IB is often much more competitive there and financing rates matter when you’re 6x leveraged...
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2020
    #15     Feb 9, 2020
  6. ids

    ids

    I stand with 9% minimum and I know the subject well. 8% down and 6% up is the OCC minimum. IB has it a bit higher.
     
    #16     Feb 9, 2020
  7. Sig

    Sig

    So there are firms that provide worse than Reg-T margin for their PM accounts? Why wouldn't you just open up a Reg-T account with them and trade those stocks in that account....and given you could do that why would they provide worse margin in PM?
     
    #17     Feb 10, 2020
  8. Brokers can set any margin they want for stocks higher than the legal minimums. For those where the PM requirements are higher than Reg T minimums, their non-PM requirements are equal or worse.
     
    #18     Feb 10, 2020
  9. Sig

    Sig

    Got it, makes sense.
     
    #19     Feb 10, 2020
  10. Robert Morse

    Robert Morse Sponsor

    This is basically very true. There are a number of symbols (Mostly ETNs and any fixed-income product) that are not PM eligible. The most typical way to treat these symbols in a PM account is to apply the same margin as they apply to Reg-t accounts.
     
    #20     Feb 10, 2020