Cancel fees are still applied as standard. If you execute against a displayed penny bid/offer then it "should trade" - but not guaranteed as it will still need to go to the exchange to execute.
So it would be possible to have a bid at 1.23 and have the market trade at 1.20 but not be filled if you weren't first in the cue then? Thanks, TNG
Yes, that could happen - if you're not at the front of the queue, and the opposing sell order didn't come in via us (we do have a very significant market share).
No, because what is comming in January is a 12-18 month long pilot on 13 option classes. What IB is offering is all the classes listed by BOX and ISE and it is offering it now.
Can I still get a worse price if I want, then post nasty things about IB when I do? Just asking so some of the IB bashers won't have to. I'm sure there will be some issues with this (mostly caused by "user error") but I think this is AWESOME. Yet another way IB is making things better (I LOVE the expired contract thing -- just get options going back 1-2 months and it will be perfect). SSB
This is such a superbly cool understatement thank you. Great innovation btw, and a good example of out-of-the-box thinking, using your power where it is needed. Great stuff. Ursa..
I think IB missed my other question: Does this market share issue mean only IB themselves, or also includes brokers who send order flow to IB?