IB customers lose $88m trading WTI crude

Discussion in 'Interactive Brokers' started by ZBZB, Apr 21, 2020.

  1. How is that relevant here?
     
    #61     Apr 22, 2020
  2. You wouldnt be asking such a dumb question if you traded ES during the recent meltdown.
     
    #62     Apr 22, 2020
    d08 likes this.
  3. Since it sounds like you were, why don't you explain it to me? Make sure not to use words that are too big, I tend to get confused easily.
     
    #63     Apr 22, 2020
  4. d08

    d08

    They are too high, maybe not for CL, other futures or forex but for equities, they absolutely are.
     
    #64     Apr 22, 2020
  5. creator

    creator

    so far got no advice and plenty of people who called me a liar with no reason.
    Below is a scrsht with the trade (bought at 0.01) and another one showing current price of the contract - it’s zero which kind of proves that they never expected it to go below zero and haven’t adjusted neither charts nor orders.

    A40F7F5B-05BD-42D1-A838-ACB3EAE5C806.png
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 23, 2020
    #65     Apr 22, 2020
    d08 likes this.
  6. Angelo_60

    Angelo_60


    Creator,

    IB doesn't allow customer to trade futures having physical delivery over the last trading days (or hours, it depends on the underlying commodity/bond):

    https://www.interactivebrokers.com/...owcategories=&p=physical&cc=&limit=100&page=1

    If I'm not mistaken, at IB, last trading day for CLK0 was April 16 (see joint jpeg, 2 business days before April 20).

    Si, it's very strange seeing you able to buy CLK0 on April 20 (sorry, don't know if this fact is of any help for you, but IB allowing you to buy on April 20 was against their own stated rules).

    And I know these rules were generally in force, because yesterday, when CLK0 turned finally positive I tried to send an order using TWS, but was unable to send it to the market. Instead, I received a warning about my order not being accepted, according to their "physical delivery futures" rules.

    So, speaking about the 88Mln loss, my guess is .............. it comes from IB customers trading CLM0, because nobody could trade CLK0 in April, 20 (and 21) with them.
    If my guess is right, the 88Mln loss in not related to negative prices of CLK0, but to the unprecedented volatilty of CLM0.
    And this is a bit worrying, as I (as everybody) used to think that IB risk management is able to identify in real time a margin call, and close the position before the account goes negative....
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2020
    #66     Apr 22, 2020
  7. ZBZB

    ZBZB

    the IB customers were trading WTI on ICE Europe.
     
    #67     Apr 22, 2020
    sampare and creator like this.
  8. creator

    creator

    thanks for the reply but ZBZB is right - it was IPE contract

    Although my account is indeed terrifyingly negative and I have no idea what to do about that
     
    #68     Apr 22, 2020
    sampare likes this.
  9. Angelo_60

    Angelo_60


    If I remember well, you have to open an official complaint (inside account management).

    After they refuse to accept your request, you will have 6 months to go to the Financial Ombdusman in London.

    You don't need an attorney, it's an 100% on line procedure, but you have to prove what's happened We all have seen IB not quoting negative prices on April 20 (I speak about Nymex, but suppose ICE was all the same), but to prove it after the fact that was not receiving orders can be complicated.... good luck.
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2020
    #69     Apr 22, 2020
    sampare and creator like this.
  10. ZBZB

    ZBZB

    Make a complaint. IB did not show negative prices. Market looked locked limit down.


     
    #70     Apr 22, 2020
    sampare, ScroogeMcDuck and creator like this.