The exact center of the Earth has zero gravity. Here is why. The force of gravity on some test mass of mass m located at distance r from the center of the Earth is given by F = G M m/r^2 Here M is the total mass *inside* the sphere of radius r. So if we are at the surface of the Earth or higher up than M = M_Earth. Let's call the mass inside of r, M(r). Let's reduce r. The total mass inside the sphere of radius r will reduce too. Assuming the Earth has uniform density d the mass M(r)=d * volume of sphere = d * (4pi/3) r^3. So M(r) = constant *r^3 and F(r)= G M(r) m/r^2 = G constant *r^3/r^2. Therefore F(r) is proportional to r, and will be zero in the center of the Earth.
Great comeback Daring LOL! OK... the more scientifically correct scenario would be: Statement: "You've got to find those areas on earth that don't have gravity-- it's an amazing experience once you do" and then asking: "Can you be more specific on exact locations...? I'd like to visit them and experience them as well." LOL The point is Daring-- you've got to at least get to the level where you can immediately filter out what is worth further consideration for keeping an open mind... and what most certainly is not.
When I see people advocating averaging down, it's pretty obvious that they don't have a good, winning strategy. Instead of trying to constantly pull a rabbit out of a hat, spend time developing a better trading system.
Why not do a Monte Carlo simulation to find out the answer? The technology is there in Microsoft Office in your computer.
his post was wise but you are 1 in amillion if you can be disciplined,cheap enough to save every dime and pay cash,long only options ,you know your limited risk going in,when you said in another post that it took two years to learn candlesticks and another post empirical pivots,you are still new to the game and should withhold judgement, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing,don't be anxious to beat your chest,learn to never beat your chest
one thing you will probably find out is how much stops hurt you there are plenty of studies not on averaging down, but dollar cost averaging, and it is surprising the conflicting views by people I assume are pretty smart and have no dog in the fight other than pride in their math
ammo... u surprise me... u really do. "Wise"? If u can't spot the glaring egregious reckless comments in his posts... I am floored... truly. P.S. I have been trading for just over 23 years actively now... fyi. How about you?
Ammo, You have kindly and clearly explained how you use a combination of trendlines and market profile peaks and low points to gather confluential areas of resistance, to short, and confluential areas of support, to cover or reduce. In a discussion board where profitable traders tend to use secrecy or disguise to explain their success you are completely the opposite, transparent, helpful and caring, for that you must be commended. At the same time, you have all also expressed efficiently and unequivocally how the downside is faster and how the upside tends to have less monstrous moves. For instance, we have heard of Black Swans but not of "White" Swans, if I may call them that. You have even discussed your money management and risk management, once again, thank you for taking the time, However, here's the part I can't figure out yet because I think it has not been explained, if it has, I apologize before hand. Have you tried shorting resistance using a fixed stop, then re-entering at the next level or upon lower high confirmation ? If so, what obstacles did you encounter upon testing this? Death by a thousand stops ? Missing the move ? Your input in this grey area is greatly appreciated.