And you took a page from that book, wanting nothing more than to draw attention to your next project, irrespective of its (questionable) value. That's your goal. And yet, you act as though you're better...
Thunderdog, you got strawmen coming out of your ears! Watch the video and tell us where it is wrong. Or are we back to group hugs and life support for the "needy"?
Did you manage to catch that, or do you have an irony deficiency? I need to watch that video about as much as I need to listen to Murdoch lecture about balanced journalism. The moment I heard Cato "Institute" I knew what time it was. If you want serious attention, you need to provide a credible source. Cato's history of obfuscation speaks for itself. In fact, their modus operandi is vaguely reminiscent of the first video you posted in this thread. And as it is, I still regret having watched that first video in its entirety. And the moral of the story is: Quacks produce quackery.
Since I know ET only so well, I have a question. Roughly what percentage of people in here agree with your economics?
I couldn't tell you. But since you like hobnobbing with the big boys, why not ask Tudor Jones, Soros and Buffett what they think and for whom they voted?
Cato Board of Directors: * K. Tucker Andersen, Senior Consultant, Cumberland Associates LLC * Frank Bond, Chairman, The Foundation Group * Edward H. Crane, President, Cato Institute * Richard J. Dennis, President, Dennis Trading Group * Ethelmae C. Humphreys, Chairman, Tamko Roofing Products, Inc. * David H. Koch, Executive Vice President, Koch Industries, Inc. * Robert A. Levy, Chairman, Cato Institute * John C. Malone, Chairman, Liberty Media Corporation * William A. Niskanen, Chairman Emeritus and Distinguished Senior Economist, Cato Institute * David H. Padden, President, Padden & Company * Lewis E. Randall, Board Member, E*Trade Financial * Howard S. Rich, Chairman, Americans for Limited Government * Donald G. Smith, President, Donald Smith & Co., Inc. * Frederick W. Smith, Chairman & CEO, FedEx Corporation * Jeffrey S. Yass, Managing Director, Susquehanna International Group, LLP * Fred Young, Former Owner, Young Radiator Company
Michael, who gives a shit? Cato tried to blur the link between tobacco and cancer in the '90s. Does that not resonate with you? Collectively, these people are intellectual frauds unencumbered by integrity. If you were to post the directors' names in bronze it wouldn't make a whit of difference. Did you not read any of the articles about the Cato "Institute" in the link I posted earlier? That should be a primer for you. Let me know if you need more. Here's the link again for your convenience: http://world.std.com/~mhuben/cato.html It's not quite as pretty when you shine a light on it.
Here is some more of the intellectual fraud you speak of: <a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp-052es.html">"Too Big to Fail?: Long-Term Capital Management and the Federal Reserve."</a> I imagine it must be difficult to cope on a daily basis with so many conspiracies in place aimed at keeping the little guy down. If people only knew the true desires of men like Richard Dennis and Fred Smith everyone would get your concerns. I sympathize with your position.
Conspiracy? No, nothing quite so dramatic. I merely see it for the lobbying arm that it is. "A "libertarian" quasi-academic think-tank which acts as a mouthpiece for the globalism, corporatism, and neoliberalism of its corporate and conservative funders. Cato is an astroturf organization: there is no significant participation by the tiny libertarian minority. They do not fund it or affect its goals. It is a creature of corporations and foundations. The major purpose of the Cato Institute is to provide propaganda and soundbites for conservative and libertarian politicians and journalists that is conveniently free of reference to funders such as tobacco, fossil fuel, investment, media, medical, and other regulated industries." What else you got?