You are funny, I found you made many baseless conclusions in your past posts but I don't want to argue with you . Look at upper area of his trade record, there is a red print"show autotrade data", click on that you will see how he made his entries on one trade. For example, there was a trade totalling 116 units,but he didn't place all units at once but he did it many times at different time.The first entry was only 1unit , then he added many entries later which amount to a total units of 116. If you were an experienced trader, once you saw his trade records, you would be aware he was averaging down because sometimes he traded 1unit, sometimes he traded 116 units,a trader can't trade like that unless he average down.
That might not be averaging down/up in a martingale fashion, he might be scaling into his positions. This is what I am trying to say. Do you have any evidence confirming that he's doing averaging down/up in a martingale? Before you accuse people of making baseless conclusions, 1) make sure you understand what people are saying and 2) make sure you have evidence backing up what you are saying. I don't want to argue with you either. Putting you on Ignore!
The thing is the site doesn't show you a chart with all his positions in the trading record so that way you can see where he made his entries and exits so we can have a clearer picture of what he did and it doesn't show the TF that he trades in either. So I guess if we want to find out more about the guy's trading, we would have to pull up a chart ourselves and trace where he made his entries and exits in his trading to see what he was doing.
The evidence is there,clear and simple: every entry had a time and price record which anyone can see. The later entry units prices were higher if he was short, and lower if he was long. Obviously you are the one who is blind and clueless and making baseless conclusions as you always did in your past posts.There are all the evidences everywhere but you simply refuse to see them. You simply have a poor imagination and therefore incapable of making sound judgements.Even all the evidences are right before your eyes you are incapable of seeing them.
99. 9% of those reports are fake. Just read it for entertainment purpose. It also gives you a Good idea how to create an impressive fake report.. Then people would think it is a holy grail.
The non-strategy that is also a system but not a strategy. @Dna7272 don't worry too much, this guy is obviously full of shit.
It is very easy to create a strategy that results in nearly 100% of your trades being profitable. New day traders frequently fall into this trap without realizing it. But when you get a large enough sample of trades so that the losing trades are properly represented the full picture then becomes clear. Here is a dirt simple example strategy that will do this for you: Never sell a loser. With this strategy 100% of the trades you close out will be profitable. And the strategy will work flawlessly until you have 100% of your account invested. At that point the truth will become painfully clear. But the usual way people fall into this trap is with slightly more complex strategies, often involving options but sometimes it can be as simple as just averaging down on your losers.