Probably. The Dem attorneys, defending these bs cases, should file complaints with all relevant attorney disciplinary commissions etc., seeking disbarment of these clowns. Otherwise we'll see this same clown show every four years. But I doubt that'll happen, as these clown shows also line the pockets of the Dem attorneys. Any corrective action will likely have to originate from a grassroots effort.
I didn't listen to the hour long conversation, but the Loudmouth in Chief seems to have put his foot into his mouth once again. Only a few more weeks of this stupidity. Then we can move on to the next scam.
You would need to listen to the whole conversation to see that President Trump wasn't asking Raffensperger to do anything untoward.
Doesn't matter. Why say something so stupid like that? In the best possible light, it means he was a fool. In the worst, he is corrupt.
And how, SPECIFICALLY, did the democrats steal the election? The microphone is yours. Let's hear it. What is the evidence you reference that has not already been presented in numerous court cases and legislative venues. What is it?
In fairness, you wouldn't accept any proof of it even if he had some, which he does not. What I'll say is what I've said all along. If you take a method of secure (as much as possible) voting - in person -and move it to a method of voting that is not secure (mail in voting) and the mail in votes go from ~34 million (I think that was the number in 2016) to ~67 Million in 2020, then there is bound to be a whole lot more shenanigans.
You would need to listen to the entire call to understand that The President did not ask Raffensperger to do anything improper.
Correct. I personally don't possess evidence, but common sense would tell someone that what we have seen is massive fraud.---Case in point---There is no legitimate need to put up boards on windows and not allow Republican observers to view counting.