Your post brought back memories from my childhood. I was fortunate to have many male role models in my life with different backgrounds and professions. As a kid spending time with them, these men made similar remarks about how life is changing from what it used to be. I didn't have a clue about the message they were trying to get across, but now I'm their age, they are gone and I understand those conversations. Maybe some of them lost hope with the changing world but mine was just begining with little background into their former life. Change with the world rather than focus on what was and never will be again. Somtimes I'd like to imagine I was born yesterday so I won't be burdened with the "way it was". The "way it was" comes in handy sometimes, though. ps. one story I enjoyed from the past is when my uncles would tell me, there were fewer traffic lights, or the lights were never red at night and how they could "make time" wherever they were going at night. A fast car, cops couldn't catch them, 2 way radio's were for shid( or somthing like that), no harm no foul, must've been fun.
The world is futile! Get over it. If you need a second opinion, your spelling and grammar sucks too... BTW, I'm old and you are a very good reminder that I have to trade well or die!! I've said it many times here on ET, Trade Well or Die Folks...
Trade currencies. Or.... take the profits from CL and offset the necessary evil by feeding the hungry and clothing the ragged. Or..... trade stocks that have a eco-friendly track record. Every young person believes that things suck. You havent lived long enuf and because you are rich by world standards you are bored and lack stimulus in your life. Fight the war on drugs. Be a volunteer firefighter or paramedic. You want to feel good? Give your life some meaning and fight back. But above all, please remember.....whining is for women and children.
Porn sites have a >3% infection rate. Probably an acceptable rate. ( Imo, google images is a land mine of virus) Here's a few celebrity stats: with some as high as 50% Celebrity 1 Jessica Biel â Major buzz about her figure and high-profile relationship with Justin Timberlake makes Jessica Biel an easy target for spammers and hackers. When âJessica Biel screensaversâ was searched, almost half of the sites were identified as containing malicious downloads with spyware, adware and potential viruses. 2 Beyoncé â Beyonce tops the MTV Video Music Award nominee list and McAfeeâs results as the most frequent, highly-ranked celebrity. Inputting âBeyoncé ringtonesâ into a search engine yielded a dangerous Web site linking to a distributor of adware and spyware. 3 Jennifer Aniston â Hollywoodâs favorite leading lady should be searched with caution. More than 40% of the Google search results for âJennifer Aniston screensaversâ contained nasty viruses, including one called the âFunLove virus.â 4 Tom Brady â The New England Patriot seems to attract many fans who want a free download of the athlete in action, but not the Trojan that comes with it, as identified by McAfee SiteAdvisor technology. 5 Jessica Simpson â Jessica Simpson is as dangerous to search online as she is famous. Searching for âJessica Simpson videosâ can mislead unsuspecting surfers to sites with potentially damaging downloads. 6 Gisele Bundchen â The worldâs highest-paid supermodel is a popular target for cybercriminals. A search for âGisele Bundchen photosâ can direct users to red-ranked sites that breached browser security in McAfeeâs tests. 7 Miley Cyrus â Cybercriminals are using Web sites related to Miley Cyrusâ image to link to other harmful sites containing spyware. 8 Megan Fox, Angelina Jolie â Both tabloid fixture Megan Fox and American icon Angelina Jolie resulted in an equal number of risky download Web sites, proving cybercriminals are in the business of capitalizing on the worldâs most famous faces. 9 Ashley Tisdale â The âHigh School Musicalâ star is a popular search term when it comes to searching for screensavers. A host of screensaver Web sites contained numerous malware-laden downloads. 10 Brad Pitt â Appearing in the top spot last year, Brad Pitt fell towards the bottom of this yearâs list, resulting in a few less, but just as dangerous, red and yellow-ranked Web sites. 11 Reese Witherspoon â Risky Web sites were identified when searching for âReese Witherspoonâ and âReese Witherspoon photosâ promoting free files with hidden malware. 12 Britney Spears â McAfee SiteAdvisor technology found a single site promoting free Britney Spears wallpaper that was embedded with more than 50 potentially infected downloads. 13 Rihanna â Free Rihanna ringtones are some of the most sought after, but some shady vendors mislead those who subscribe by gathering and selling their personal information. 14 Lindsay Lohan â McAfee SiteAdvisor flagged Lindsay Lohan screen saver sites as offering a combined 50+ free screen savers infected with Trojans, viruses and spyware. 15 Kim Kardashian â The biggest reality star in recent months is now susceptible to Internet lurkers too. A search for Kim Kardashian wallpaper and screen savers generated numerous downloads veiled with malware. http://wallstnation.com/node/2330
Wait! What??? Did you really mean to say "Fight <i>against</i> the war on drugs", or does this mean that YOU are actually in favor of the senseless political imprisonment of hundreds of thousands of harmless drug users? Subjecting people to lengthy prison terms for the 'crime' of putting prohibited substances into their own bodies while directly harming no one? Ruining the lives of the many functioning addicts like me who are actually <b>better off</b> on drugs than not? YOU of all people support this shit? <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RbwSwvUaRqc&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RbwSwvUaRqc&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> Really??? Fight the war on drugs? Fuck your war on drugs!
Typical addict behavior. If you can clear your mind long enuf to focus on something other than the nose on your face, you would clearly extrapolate that an individual fighting the war on drugs is radically different than institutions fighting the war on drugs. But because addicts are impulsive by their very nature it does not surprise me that you jumped out of your chair and ran into the wall without first checking to see if there is a door.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=193592 Common-sense is out-of-fashion. I have little hope about this thread.
In that case, why not go around advising people to go "join Al-Qaida"? And then, when an observer points out their instinctive horror at your suggestion that joining a band of terrorist thugs would be a good idea, you can come back at them like a condescending dick to point out the fact that "an individual waging violent jihad is soooo much different than when an institution does it".