No, that would not be my advice exactly. He should just not do the interview and assert Executive Privilege since it is known that mueller wants to question him about interactions with subordinates in regard to obstruction and collusion/ not a crime. Mueller can then decide whether he wants to go the subpoena route or not and try out the same questions before the grand jury and can assert both executive privilege and the fifth depending on the nature of the subject of the question. Guiliani is subject to spells of being ditzy and going off the record. Nevertheless, I think his basic strategy of resistance is a good one. Having said that, trumps triumphant rallies and his own ego continue to think make him think that he can go into any situation and command it so he has as a death wish that may prevail and he might show up. I think some good work has been done as far as limiting the scope of mueller's scope if such an interview does occur- but beyond that Trump has gotta do what he has gotta do. I would not recommend showing up at all, ever. It is still very volatile though. Right now I think Trump is at risk of showing up. But if tomorrow, he begins to believe that Don Jr. or Jared are going to be indicted or attempted anyway, he can go full legal and dark at any moment. So Mueller needs to watch his arse too, along with Trump. He knows that not getting convictions on Trump or even an interview will be a full, full defeat- of which he has some notable ones on his resume already. If Meuller thinks he has the evidence on Trump without Trump giving him some more, then he can always seek an indictment without eve having Trump appear at the grand jury. I mean for those who are still stuck on stupid and think he can be indicted. Most leftoids have reluctantly come around on that issue in the last year, but for those who have not, then fine, just go ahead and indict him. Don't be surprised if the judge requires the prosecutor to identify the specific crimes that they are being asked to consider. We have not gone full Soviet KGB just yet, although we are getting there.
So I am not your personal tutor, nor am I here to debate already established law. If you are not familiar with this topic or are incapable of doing some rather simple scholarly research then perhaps this topic is not for you.
Thats awfully Orwellian thinking..... "If you oppose us, its a crime" And if the president (who has the constitutional authority to hire/fire people at the head of any department) opposes us, its obstruction of justice..... this is straight out of 1984.
Good luck selling half the country on obstruction of justice when no crime took place, there will be civil war if Mueller tries to pull bullshit like that.
All of this is good stuff with the exception of your analysis of Mueller and what would be considered a defeat. There is no victory or defeat, only a complete and thorough investigation. That’s his job. Mueller has been charged to get it right, prosecute the criminals and inform the American people of what went on during the 2016 election with regard to the Russians and Teumps campaign.
I have no doubt you would grab your gun because you are confused on a legal matter and refuse to educate yourself on it. People like you are more common in America in these strange times.
Heh, viewers should savor this crabwalk sideways. This has been all about getting Trump. Even the mannafort judge sees that and openly says so. Now, when the rubber meets the road the left-tards see that that mueller cannot do the deed and get a conviction on TRUMP- not some sideplayer. So they begin to talk about how Mueller is just serving some noble cause to do a general investigation. Nope, time for Mueller to deliver on the main kill or be known for another defeat. Also, you gotta be on some lefty planet to believe that mueller is just doing a legal investigation. He is preparing to dump a whole portfolio of dirt on trump to see if - even though he cannot get a conviction on Trump- he can still get the dems to impeach him after the midterms. BECAUSE ATTEMPTING TO OVERTHROW A LAWFULLY ELECTED PRESIDENT IS WHAT THE FBI/DOJ LEADERSHIP TYPES DO.