Biden has a law degree so he’s studied it more than I have. I doubt Trump knows shit about it. Obama certainly has the best understanding of it being he was a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago for 12 years. That said, one’s understanding of the Constitution isn’t the end all be all. What matters is who can improve the country the most going forward. Obviously I’m not a conventional candidate. I’m not going to adhere to the cookie cutter image of one either. I reject dogmas/stigmas/traditions surrounding the office including the idea that I need to be married to have the job. My entire campaign is about rejecting these things and getting people to look at objective truths. I want you to criticize me though. Maybe I can learn from it and gain more perspective.
Your ability to search for this information likely rivals mine. I have to rely on data from a link I would find off of a Google search. I don’t have expert advisors giving me accurate information, but perhaps there’s a government website with this data.
From your campaign kick-off video You are running as a Democrat. You plan to remove (outlaw) political parties. You want to throw out the U.S. Constitution. You want to replace income taxes with progressive wealth and consumption taxes because that will give people more of an incentive to produce wealth for your government. Your energy policy is "drill baby drill." Your campaign slogan is "better than the other two." You being from Florida reminds me of a famous, successful, Georgian politician with similar ideas.
I can see that’s not the Peach state you’re referring to by Georgia. It’s not for the government, it’s for society and our long-term success. Nobody likes paying taxes, but taxes are a necessary evil. As for my energy policy, drill baby drill is the only logical short-term solution to lower energy prices in my opinion. Long-term we need to move towards renewable green energy. It’s really hard to legislate around climate change. It requires a worldwide effort. Many of the effects are estimations with a wide range of outcomes. I would hope to work with the world to come up with ideas to reverse some of what we caused and help cool it. There’s going to be a lot of cost-benefit analysis. I don’t know what projections we can make for innovation to help. We know if we do nothing it will be costly. We know if we do something it will be costly. I’m going to need a huge amount of help to tackle this and come up with a more detailed long-term policy that’s more than just empty bullshit based on what people want to hear.
LOL Thank God I have this kilroy nutjob on ignore. He reminds me of that idiot Beto or whatever his name is. Not going to get elected, that's for sure. Maybe as dog catcher?
Somebody ignored me positing here so I can't see what they wrote. Weird that they can see my thread, but I can't see them. You'd think it would be the opposite if somebody ignores you. Anyways, I generally just need two things from anybody who wants to help: 1. Money-lots and lots of money, in case you're unaware, this shit gets expensive. I will be creating a website and setting up a GoFundMe to donate to in the near future. 2. Volunteers to get signatures for me so I can get on the ballots. I've contacted a few states already about this, but they need to get through 2022. Information on how you can volunteer will be on my website.
Bloomberg had all the money in the world and couldn't solve the same problem you will have(black voters not liking him do to stop and frisk).Bloomberg blew over a billion dollars and never had a chace.Anybody donating to you would be doing the same.
Well I only got as far as Kevin wants to remove parties but I was reaching for pause from a moment before wheeln I learned he was from Florida. I agree with the party stuff but I'm not going to listen to anybody from Florida as its such a silly place. That's said I've always believed that people elect representatives to represent them but representative then being under a strict party whip is spectacularly undemocratic. Its so inconsistent with the basics of democracy people can't see it. Party whip did this.
Someone recently talked about this down in the feedback thread in which I chimed in with an explanation about how that happens. It could be intentional or not intentional. Intentional occurs when they read your thread while not logged in and then when you're the current "last poster" in your thread...they then post in your thread if you have them on ignore/block or they have you on ignore/block. These idiots typically announce to the forum that they're ignoring/blocking you or they complain about you ignoring/blocking them...without you saying anything about it. Ironically, they then post in your thread, revealing to Baron what they're doing considering I think Baron is now paying attention to this issue as of lately. Not intentionally involves them responding to a direct message post by someone they're following. Thus, the person they're following is not on your ignore/block nor is the person ignoring/blocking you. Simply, the message post you can not see is someone responding to someone else in your (this) thread. The latter above happens to me sometimes when I'm responding to someone I follow but I don't know the direct message from within their profile of the person I'm following is a message post that will send me to a thread of someone on my block list until after I've replied. The not intentional replies is something Baron can fix by not allowing us to see message posts of those we follow that had occurred in the threads of those on our ignore/block list. Simply, there's a glitch with the ignore/block when people we follow and people we ignore/block are posting in the same thread. wrbtrader