I see a number of green rays on the chart, but the aren't attached to particular bars - they just appear without being attached to a price bar (highlighted with purple arrows). What is their purpose?
Green rays are named "bookmaks". When a ray begins it is kept in force. Notice how there is always a green ray in effect. The platform I use is such that the ower does not understand sophisticated trading. (review the training videos). we work to influence those who own trading platforms. The status of platforms at this point is that the subscribers accept their performance. John Bollinger is on the same page as we are. Progress is being made. In the mean time, we degap bar by bar. As you see day after day all the math that is automated is done with the idea that the platform venders will catch up some day. You may discover that we do not degap the rtl's. They fit into the "good enough" category. Notice the boundaries (orange) of the laterals are also degapped. On the log, there is a column labelled "Arrows (UL)" This is for judging internals to get "wait". Also you see the column "degap". A check is used to notify ourselves that we need to degap price and see how the RDBMS turns out. There is no degapping on volume rays. A given ray ends when it is replaced during a trend forwarding. Thus you see flights of stairs that go up or go down.
Here I also have to scratch my head. According to the volume test procedure bar 12 is a P1 creating a PP1 with bar 10 and 11. Yes, it is also a BO RTL BUT it is missing the T1. Jack tried to make clear to Jered that there MUST be a T1 to consider a "BO RTL/T1". Here are the possibilities and I hope Jack can clear it up. 1. It is wrongly labeled. 2. We somehow missed another rule which applies here. 3. It is one of those mysterious "P1, P2 without T1" situations.
This may be a very stupid question, but it's nagging at me. In using the failsafes (BO,T1 and BM,REV), do you automatically reverse when those EEs occur? Or is it business as usual with them like any other EE - if one of those occur, you look for the next EE to be on the right side of the Modrian Table to confirm the 'c' turn?
I see another possibility: 4. We are looking at the final annotation. In realtime we could have had a T1 which then at the end of the bar turned into a P1.
Yes the rules are correct and answer 1. applies. P1 to P2 occurs only on bar 78, sometimes. The tules are: 1. On bar 78 "advance one peak". 2. is there is no T1 before or after bar 78 in a trend formation, then consider the first P! to play the role of a T1 instead.
* The four types of trends need to be considered for always being correct on reversing. For the Set A, C and D there are no cuations. BUT for Set B there is a concern to handle. In Set B the turns are c to a to c. You DO NOT REVERSE on the second c turn, you just hold and label the turn with the same arrow as was used on the a turn. By fathoming the significance of the n-1 to n relationships of EE's you can deduce the "why" of the above.
here is the whole day for 02OCT13. We are doing our second doubling this week. Tomorrow our team may have a pause since techie's are upgrading some of our switch gear. For 02CT13 the week 7 report will include some open trading prints; some "trading in chop* prints"; and finally using scalping to break reversals into two opposite independent trade of opposite sentiment (An intuitive carving precursor learning experience) prints. *A CW term that means trading in narrow ranges where "whipsaw" is rumored to exist in CW minds.