Interestingly I have never seen PFP, FPF and PEP before. The names for the eleven volume elements that he used before are: "...Here are the 11 expression names which you have been using: P1, T1, P2, T2P, T2F, Not T2P, Not T2F, Not Not T2P, Not Not T2F, P3F and P3P..."
I'm doing the first step to point out inconsistencies or errors. It is up to Jack to decide if my point of view is correct or not. Sometimes I am right and he corrects his error(s). But sometimes he pulls another rabbit out of his hat and shows/proves to me what I didn't notice when I made my false assumption. But have a look at those bars yourself. If you degap them, what do you get? I'm looking forward to see your "bar degapper" for Ninjatrader. Then there will be no doubt anymore.
Yes,like i said,the code not perfect,and i made it on the bid side so i have less interbar gaps that way.What i get?I get sometimes FTP instead of XB,etc...I try to stay alerted,in this sense. To get the fully de-gapped display is a very extensive work for the programmer.I checked it with one of the kick-ass Pro.He said it`s doable,but would be extensive and expensive.But let it be expensive,if you know what i mean.We`ve scheduled to do it,but cancelled since i didn`t have enough info on other stuff as channels,volume/price matrix.We`ve resolved the volume/price matrix issue,but stuck with the channel logic.Stepans code seems not bad,but it`s closed to be viewed.I have no idea about its logic,neither do the Pro.I won`t be able to use it over de-gapped template.The problem is, when the session and bars will be de-gapped,every indicator should be re-coded to fit that template.As soon as i get the channels logic i`ll ask the Pro to do the coding.
Don't know if Jack will check everything but what how do you call a formation where the high of both bars is the same but the low of the second bar is lower than the on of the first bar? Look at bar 7 and 18.
thank you for the input! I hope Jack will help us to get it some day.May be it could be coded then,too.