According to this guy, it is necessary : mx2tradingsystem.com And this guy has AUDITED results On the other hand , when I go to striker.com , a broker who only displays actual results of trading systems, I don't find a hypothetical disclaimer like one would expect. Anyone can shed some light on this ? Maybe it's because that guy has another system that is not audited ...
I think if you say they are actual results, you would have to be willing to provide audited trading records on request...
I don't know about websites but I've managed a hedge fund in the past and currently run an LLC CTA firm and I am not required to use that hypothetical disclaimer. I find it odd that a website that has audited results would be required to post that disclaimer unless they are doing some simulated trading in addition to actual trading. Ask them for a copy of their auditor's statement.
Exactly, probably it has something to do with that other system he offers for which no results are listed