You’re silly. That’s standard language until the case is closed. The investigation will theoretically continue through Hunter Biden’s 2 year probation just in case he violates the probation. There is no longer an active investigation in the sense you are claiming. This of course being dependent on what the judge does when the plea is before him/her/they/them/ifbutooforewhere.
lol. The lies just keep growing. Where’s the money, dummy? Where’d it come from that it’s “not pretty?”
At the risk of being taken out of context, please allow me to clarify. Of course it matters if there is actual fraud. All I was saying is that if enough people believe that there was actual fraud, then a considerable effort needs to be made to show unequivocally that there was no fraud otherwise you're left with a large portion of the populace that distrusts, or even undermines the confidence in the system. And that can be just as damaging as actual fraud would have been.
I'm curious how you say it is mythology when there are photos, videos, admission and hard evidence of crimes being committed? To be clear, I'm talking about Hunter Biden. In regards to Joe, there are definitely trails leading to him but without sufficient resources (resources that were freely and willingly applied to Trump) to pursue to clear the name of Joe Biden, you'll always have this doubt.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-courts-alito-defends-against-ethics-questions-2023-06-21/ US Supreme Court's Alito defends private jet trip to Alaska Regarding the flight, Alito wrote that Singer had "allowed me to occupy what would have otherwise been an unoccupied seat." Alito stayed at the King Salmon Lodge, which ProPublica said charged more than $1,000 a day. Alito called the portrayal "misleading" and said he stayed in a "modest one-room unit." Alito said the justices commonly interpreted financial disclosure requirements to mean that "accommodations and transportation for social events were not reportable gifts."
I am merely stating that the special prosecutor has not said the case is closed and that it is ongoing. Even Bill Barr said "Merrick Garland needs to clarify that to the public since the special prosecutor says one thing and Hunter's lawyer another." Does the special counsel end his service after the court accepts the deal or not. The fact that someone needs to comply with an agreement at a future point does not equate to an ongoing investigation. That needs to be clarified. Having said that, let's go in another direction with it. If there is not an active investigation still on progress and the special prosecutor's appointment is not still in effect, then that is even better. Because the FBI and DOJ have been using the "active investigation" ruse as a basis for stonewalling the release of critical records. If someone wants to declare that the investigation and case are closed, fine, let me and the Oversight Committee know. Pronto.
Comer has reported on the countries and the recipients based on bank transaction records that he has and that are still coming in. If he does not have those records, then he will need to explain that. If he does, your Crime Family needs to explain it. You are hoping that it will all go away. I am thinking it will not. A witness of two may not be located but that is independent of the standalone information in the transaction reports.