Huge Econ News for Israel

Discussion in 'Politics' started by unretired, Apr 14, 2010.

  1. I agree with a lot of what you are saying. However, I think you are intertwining a few separate concepts.

    I never said that I didn't believe in GOD. I don't believe in religious dogma, and I certainly don't have holy faith in individual people.

    It is undeniable that there is a ton of wisdom, provable history, spiritual truth and even scientific proof in the Torah, as well as in other ancient texts.

    So, let me make one more thing clear: it is MY understanding and interpretation of the Torah which partially justifies my stance AGAINST zionism. I would gladly read over your biblical support of zionism though.

    From www.jewsnotzionists.org:

    "Judaism is a religion. Judaism is not a race or a nationality. That was and still remains the consensus amongst the rabbis.

    We were given the Holy Land by G-d in order to be able to study and practice the Torah without disturbance and to attain levels of holiness difficult to attain outside of the Holy Land. We abused the privilege and we were expelled. That is exactly what all Jews say in their prayers on every Jewish festival, "Umipnay chatoenu golinu mayartsaynu" - "Because of our sins we were expelled from our land".

    We have been forsworn by G-d "not to enter the Holy Land as a body before the predestined time", "not to rebel against the nations", to be loyal citizens, not to do anything against the will of any nation or its honour, not to seek vengeance, discord, restitution or compensation; "not to leave exile ahead of time." On the contrary; we have to be humble and accept the yoke of exile. To violate the oaths would result in "your flesh will be made prey as the deer and the antelope in the forest," and the redemption will be delayed. "

    Hmmm...the plot thickens.

    Do recall that the early zionist were worldly people, not religious leaders. It really burns me that these people present themselves as the representatives of the world's Jewry. Infact even the name Israel is troubling to me. Is that not mere idoltry? Who are they to take the name we use to refer to the world's collective Jewish people? I think they have successfully brainwashed most Jews into equating Y'israel with Israel. It's pure horse hockey!

    The zionist do not represent me, that is for sure.
     
    #41     Apr 15, 2010
  2.  
    #42     Apr 15, 2010
  3. Yes, because Iran has threatened Europe and the U.S. as well. You obviously don't understand radical Islam. They don't hate just Jews. Anyone who doesn't believe what they do is an "infidel" and an "enemy".

     
    #43     Apr 15, 2010
  4. Thank you for such an excellent answer.
    No wonder you seemed so sensible.

    I applaud you for that.
     
    #45     Apr 15, 2010
  5. You seem like a cool dude. I would like to know more about why you see things the way you do. I retain the right to change my mind on any opinion.

    If these other idiots get the discussion closed down, just PM me.
     
    #46     Apr 15, 2010
  6. It is hard to trust Israel Government and US government after 9/11.

    If you don't already know 9/11 is inside job CIA/Mossad operation. Then you are behind the curve by a mile.

    I am not saying Arabs are all wonderful people. BUT THEY DIDN'T ATTACK US ON 9/11 CIA/Mossad did.



    Mossad Did 9/11 says former Director Of U.S. Army War College!

    "What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS
    Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it. I have had long conversations over the
    past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine
    Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent
    certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period . . . And the Zionists are
    playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one,
    if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done."

    http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_12075
     
    #47     Apr 15, 2010
  7. War and Natural Gas: The Israeli Invasion and Gaza's Offshore Gas Fields


    by Michel Chossudovsky

    The military invasion of the Gaza Strip by Israeli Forces bears a direct relation to the control and ownership of strategic offshore gas reserves.

    This is a war of conquest. Discovered in 2000, there are extensive gas reserves off the Gaza coastline.

    British Gas (BG Group) and its partner, the Athens based Consolidated Contractors International Company (CCC) owned by Lebanon's Sabbagh and Koury families, were granted oil and gas exploration rights in a 25 year agreement signed in November 1999 with the Palestinian Authority.

    The rights to the offshore gas field are respectively British Gas (60 percent); Consolidated Contractors (CCC) (30 percent); and the Investment Fund of the Palestinian Authority (10 percent). (Haaretz, October 21, 2007).

    The PA-BG-CCC agreement includes field development and the construction of a gas pipeline.(Middle East Economic Digest, Jan 5, 2001).

    The BG licence covers the entire Gazan offshore marine area, which is contiguous to several Israeli offshore gas facilities. (See Map below). It should be noted that 60 percent of the gas reserves along the Gaza-Israel coastline belong to Palestine.

    The BG Group drilled two wells in 2000: Gaza Marine-1 and Gaza Marine-2. Reserves are estimated by British Gas to be of the order of 1.4 trillion cubic feet, valued at approximately 4 billion dollars. These are the figures made public by British Gas. The size of Palestine's gas reserves could be much larger.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Who Owns the Gas Fields

    The issue of sovereignty over Gaza's gas fields is crucial. From a legal standpoint, the gas reserves belong to Palestine.

    The death of Yasser Arafat, the election of the Hamas government and the ruin of the Palestinian Authority have enabled Israel to establish de facto control over Gaza's offshore gas reserves.

    British Gas (BG Group) has been dealing with the Tel Aviv government. In turn, the Hamas government has been bypassed in regards to exploration and development rights over the gas fields.

    The election of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2001 was a major turning point. Palestine's sovereignty over the offshore gas fields was challenged in the Israeli Supreme Court. Sharon stated unequivocally that "Israel would never buy gas from Palestine" intimating that Gaza's offshore gas reserves belong to Israel.

    In 2003, Ariel Sharon, vetoed an initial deal, which would allow British Gas to supply Israel with natural gas from Gaza's offshore wells. (The Independent, August 19, 2003)

    The election victory of Hamas in 2006 was conducive to the demise of the Palestinian Authority, which became confined to the West Bank, under the proxy regime of Mahmoud Abbas.

    In 2006, British Gas "was close to signing a deal to pump the gas to Egypt." (Times, May, 23, 2007). According to reports, British Prime Minister Tony Blair intervened on behalf of Israel with a view to shunting the agreement with Egypt.

    The following year, in May 2007, the Israeli Cabinet approved a proposal by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert "to buy gas from the Palestinian Authority." The proposed contract was for $4 billion, with profits of the order of $2 billion of which one billion was to go the Palestinians.

    Tel Aviv, however, had no intention on sharing the revenues with Palestine. An Israeli team of negotiators was set up by the Israeli Cabinet to thrash out a deal with the BG Group, bypassing both the Hamas government and the Palestinian Authority:

    "Israeli defence authorities want the Palestinians to be paid in goods and services and insist that no money go to the Hamas-controlled Government." (Ibid, emphasis added)

    The objective was essentially to nullify the contract signed in 1999 between the BG Group and the Palestinian Authority under Yasser Arafat.

    Under the proposed 2007 agreement with BG, Palestinian gas from Gaza's offshore wells was to be channeled by an undersea pipeline to the Israeli seaport of Ashkelon, thereby transferring control over the sale of the natural gas to Israel.

    The deal fell through. The negotiations were suspended:

    "Mossad Chief Meir Dagan opposed the transaction on security grounds, that the proceeds would fund terror". (Member of Knesset Gilad Erdan, Address to the Knesset on "The Intention of Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to Purchase Gas from the Palestinians When Payment Will Serve Hamas," March 1, 2006, quoted in Lt. Gen. (ret.) Moshe Yaalon, Does the Prospective Purchase of British Gas from Gaza's Coastal Waters Threaten Israel's National Security? Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, October 2007)

    Israel's intent was to foreclose the possibility that royalties be paid to the Palestinians. In December 2007, The BG Group withdrew from the negotiations with Israel and in January 2008 they closed their office in Israel.(BG website).

    Invasion Plan on The Drawing Board

    The invasion plan of the Gaza Strip under "Operation Cast Lead" was set in motion in June 2008, according to Israeli military sources:

    "Sources in the defense establishment said Defense Minister Ehud Barak instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare for the operation over six months ago [June or before June] , even as Israel was beginning to negotiate a ceasefire agreement with Hamas."(Barak Ravid, Operation "Cast Lead": Israeli Air Force strike followed months of planning, Haaretz, December 27, 2008)

    That very same month, the Israeli authorities contacted British Gas, with a view to resuming crucial negotiations pertaining to the purchase of Gaza's natural gas:

    "Both Ministry of Finance director general Yarom Ariav and Ministry of National Infrastructures director general Hezi Kugler agreed to inform BG of Israel's wish to renew the talks.

    The sources added that BG has not yet officially responded to Israel's request, but that company executives would probably come to Israel in a few weeks to hold talks with government officials." (Globes online- Israel's Business Arena, June 23, 2008)

    The decision to speed up negotiations with British Gas (BG Group) coincided, chronologically, with the planning of the invasion of Gaza initiated in June. It would appear that Israel was anxious to reach an agreement with the BG Group prior to the invasion, which was already in an advanced planning stage.

    Moreover, these negotiations with British Gas were conducted by the Ehud Olmert government with the knowledge that a military invasion was on the drawing board. In all likelihood, a new "post war" political-territorial arrangement for the Gaza strip was also being contemplated by the Israeli government.

    In fact, negotiations between British Gas and Israeli officials were ongoing in October 2008, 2-3 months prior to the commencement of the bombings on December 27th.

    In November 2008, the Israeli Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of National Infrastructures instructed Israel Electric Corporation (IEC) to enter into negotiations with British Gas, on the purchase of natural gas from the BG's offshore concession in Gaza. (Globes, November 13, 2008)

    "Ministry of Finance director general Yarom Ariav and Ministry of National Infrastructures director general Hezi Kugler wrote to IEC CEO Amos Lasker recently, informing him of the government's decision to allow negotiations to go forward, in line with the framework proposal it approved earlier this year.

    The IEC board, headed by chairman Moti Friedman, approved the principles of the framework proposal a few weeks ago. The talks with BG Group will begin once the board approves the exemption from a tender." (Globes Nov. 13, 2008)


    Gaza and Energy Geopolitics

    The military occupation of Gaza is intent upon transferring the sovereignty of the gas fields to Israel in violation of international law.

    What can we expect in the wake of the invasion?

    What is the intent of Israel with regard to Palestine's Natural Gas reserves?

    A new territorial arrangement, with the stationing of Israeli and/or "peacekeeping" troops?

    The militarization of the entire Gaza coastline, which is strategic for Israel?

    The outright confiscation of Palestinian gas fields and the unilateral declaration of Israeli sovereignty over Gaza's maritime areas?

    If this were to occur, the Gaza gas fields would be integrated into Israel's offshore installations, which are contiguous to those of the Gaza Strip. (See Map 1 above).

    These various offshore installations are also linked up to Israel's energy transport corridor, extending from the port of Eilat, which is an oil pipeline terminal, on the Red Sea to the seaport - pipeline terminal at Ashkelon, and northwards to Haifa, and eventually linking up through a proposed Israeli-Turkish pipeline with the Turkish port of Ceyhan.

    Ceyhan is the terminal of the Baku, Tblisi Ceyhan Trans Caspian pipeline. "What is envisaged is to link the BTC pipeline to the Trans-Israel Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline, also known as Israel's Tipline." (See Michel Chossudovsky, The War on Lebanon and the Battle for Oil, Global Research, July 23, 2006)

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11680
     
    #48     Apr 15, 2010
  8. Reading the previous article, one would conclude that these Zionists are nothing but criminals and robbers with no respect to international law or human lives.
     
    #49     Apr 15, 2010
  9. Mav88

    Mav88

    yeah blah blah blah, as if any of the muslim societies are even worthy of being called civilized.

    Time to just shut up, incompetant muslims tried several times to annihilate Israel and failed. To the victors go the spoils.
     
    #50     Apr 15, 2010