It should and would have done what any other imaginary non existent thing would do. Nothing. Any God worth its salt would not have invented it in the first place. That should be a good start.
Is that a christian thing. When you can't defend your indefensible christian nonsense , divert the whole thing onto someone else's indefensible islamic nonsense.
But the un-Christian thing to do is to bring up Hitler and the Holocaust...! Meanwhile the crimes of communist atheists go unmentioned...! If atheists kill Jews or hate gays guess who will be the # 1 evil in the world!
It's pretty obvious your focus is on being anti-christian vs the state of human rights for the homosexual vis a vis religious dominance.
So, you're saying: God should never have given us the ability to choose between evil and good -or - He should not have allowed evil to get started in the first place.(not created/destroyed the source that it came from) Which is it?
all leaders see religion as a tool. David Kuo, the former deputy director of the White House office of faith-based initiatives, implies that George W. Bush is not fond of Christians. He maintains in his new book, Tempting Faith, that Bush and those around him regularly mock and make fun of Christians, especially Evangelicals. For example, he quotes Karl Rove as saying Evangelicals are "nuts." It was quite common, according to Kuo, for Bush and those around him to look upon Christians as useful idiots. http://newsblaze.com/story/20061016225150nnnn.nb/topstory.html
well, if i was god hitler would have had a stroke. how should god handle evil? well how about this. every time a catholic priest pulls up his robe to rape an innocent boy he is struck by lightening. word would soon get around that god doesnt like that behavior. the fact that he did not leads logical thinking people to conclude god wants those priests to rape boys.