How will banks survive deep NIRP?

Discussion in 'Economics' started by babyjake1961, Mar 28, 2016.

  1. piezoe

    piezoe

    Thanks, I'd never heard of that. I looked it up.
     
    #61     Mar 31, 2016
    dartmus likes this.
  2. Just wait for the first big bank to go under the current bailouts prohibition to see how useful the FDIC turns out to be.
     
    #62     Mar 31, 2016
  3. piezoe

    piezoe

    The FDIC can only technically run out of money, they can't actually run out of money. You are aware of that?
     
    #63     Apr 1, 2016
  4. If they are given more tax money, how will it be different from a bailout then?
     
    #64     Apr 1, 2016
  5. piezoe

    piezoe

    They won't be given money, they will borrow what they need if they are short and pay it back via increased insurance premiums that banks pay to the FDIC. I guess you are aware that the Tarp account is on track to return a net profit to the Treasury and thus to the taxpayer. https://www.treasury.gov/initiative...s/bank-investment-programs/Pages/default.aspx
     
    #65     Apr 1, 2016
  6. No one has any money nor is given any, everyone borrows. I've heard this somewhere.
     
    #66     Apr 2, 2016
  7. Banjo

    Banjo

    #67     Apr 2, 2016
  8. If they are so omnipotent, why didn't ZIRP work out for them, so they now contemplate NIRP?
     
    #68     Apr 2, 2016
  9. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    #69     Apr 7, 2016
  10. piezoe

    piezoe

    That's correct. TARP does not account for the entire amount of balance sheet expansion, but it is part of it. That is a point I have tried to make here many, many times, and thankfully it seems to be sinking in with those who foolishly maintain that QE accomplished nothing. Nothing could, in fact, be further from the truth. Through QE, Treasury was able to very quickly raise many billions without putting upward pressure on rates. And that money, raised in this way, is the lowest cost money we tax payers can raise! Now that Tarp is winding down, Treasury will coordinate with The Fed in reducing, albeit slowly so as not to cause disruptions, the balance sheet. There are many traders who still think QE is exactly the same as printing and simply do not understand Central Bank operations. And who could blame them, because it is rather complex. But the main point is that money created via QE is all tied to debt, and this is a reversible process. When it is properly managed, it can be extremely helpful in ameliorating the effect of a crisis. Hats off to the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve for a magnificent job in handling what otherwise would have become a dreadful crisis; a crisis, I'm sorry to say, largely of the Fed's own making.
     
    #70     Apr 7, 2016