You can look at the distribution of people posting in the es journal over time: http://www.donotrememberthisaddress.com/financialmarkets/esposters.php
I noticed a definite bias while typing, I kept going from my left hand to right, which produced a very unrandom set of 0's and 1's. So I decided to give two different samples. The first sample was created with my left hand typing 1-5 and my right - 6-0. I suppose you could think 1-5 as "1" and 6-0 as "0". The second sample, however, is exactly what you asked for. -------------------------------------- FIRST SAMPLE: 6578310238 3838474748 3092837478 3839201928 9377489392 0929938947 8100110837 4783929837 4747839280 1029837478 Translation of first sample into 0's and 1's: 0100110110 1010101010 1001010100 1010101010 0100100101 0010010010 0100110010 1001010010 1010010100 1010010100 ----------------------------------------- SECOND SAMPLE: 1010101010 1001010101 0101001010 1011001010 1010101010 1010101010 1011010100 1010101010 1010101010 1010101010 -------------------------------
1111101111 1110100011 0001000000 1000000011 1101010100 1000011011 0000100000 0001111011 1101100111 1110111111
1010010110 1010001001 0101011101 0011101001 0110101011 1010001010 1001011001 0101001101 1010100111 0010011000
I don't think anything is random. Random is just a word for 'lack of information.' A coin toss is not random. If we could measure the velocity, slope, density of the ground, etc... we would know if heads or tails would come up almost every time.
This is one of the reasons why people argue so much about the random walk hypothesis. People do not agree on the definition of what random means.