How to research and verify trading ideas

Discussion in 'Strategy Building' started by talontrading, Nov 2, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. My first reaction/question on reading this is how do you handle the long term upward drift of many markets? Do you detrend as a step 0?

    Apologies if I've stepped in here and missed some fundamental piece of information. I've not read the entire thread.


    Thx
    D
     
    #281     Nov 28, 2009
  2. No need for apologies.

    You're overthinking... no need to detrend anything... use the simple rules I posted exactly as they were given as a starting point. There's nothing significant left out... we trade a slightly different parameter set but it's basically the same thing.

     
    #282     Nov 28, 2009
  3. Removing condition 1 would yield better performances for the buy side. (At least for equities). Basically a dip buying strategy that has always been working well but hard to scale up.
     
    #283     Nov 29, 2009
  4. This is certainly something that should be considered. Not sure I know what you mean by "hard to scale up" though.

    At any rate, people looking at this idea should consider the ramifications of removing condition 1. Though I haven't run the test I am sure it would dramatically increase performance, but....

    What comes after the .... in the previous sentence?


     
    #284     Nov 29, 2009
  5. 4XQs

    4XQs

    ...increase risk?
    ...increase volatility of your returns?
    ...mandate lower position size?
     
    #285     Nov 29, 2009
  6. JScott

    JScott

    Attached is the low-budget quantitative analysis of this strategy going back three years. I used the DIA this time as a proxy for the DJIA – which had a few more signals. No fancy performance strategy, just a quick check of entry, exits and heat (risk). No stop baked in a la Talon, but a big stop isn’t needed based on this limited data sample.

    Note: Entry signal was only after close was “less than” day before for three days in a row . . . not exactly the same as “three red bars” like I said before. I’d say that a little flexibility with the definition of “consecutive close down” might show many more, very good signals.

    Also, percentile of 5 day close is often = 50%, but exit was determined when it exceeded 50%.

    I like this strategy because it is surely very uncomfortable for nearly all traders to buy/sell into the face of momentum. Wouldn’t bother me if proper homework was done.

    See attached for a summary of manual backtesting if you like. Thanks.

    Keep trading.

    J.Scott
     
    #286     Nov 29, 2009
  7. cvds16

    cvds16

    I still don't get it: I see about four different ways to calculate this over the last 15 days at first glace, there might be more if I think this through: do you use closing price, range, volume-adjusted prices, ... What seems 'obvious' to you isn't it to me, so I would like to see the actual calculation. And, yes, I know what a percentile is ... I just don't get what 'raw data' you take into account from which you calculate your nth percentile ... (it might be me having a major hangover from last night :D ) so giving the details on how you get the 10th percentiel of the last 15 days of aapl would be nice ...
     
    #287     Nov 29, 2009
  8. closing price. the system as i gave it here only requires closing price. now, it might be smart to use highs / lows, but as a starting point i just gave closes.

     
    #288     Nov 29, 2009
  9. cvds16

    cvds16

    maybe I overlooked something in going over things: from what I understand now you just take the closes ... and then the nth percentile ... :confused:
     
    #289     Nov 29, 2009
  10. cvds16

    cvds16

    ok, our last messages crossed, thanks, I get it know ...
     
    #290     Nov 29, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.