I hear all the time Trump’s this or that.... please point me to this violent rhetoric, most of what I encounter is people misstating and out of context remarks that are used to purposely inflame the listener.
Oh no. I'm not saying Trump isn't using violent rhetoric. I'm saying the people who vote for him and donate to him aren't hate monger financiers. They voted for the better of the two options. And they certainly shouldn't be called out for their vote by someone who IS using the callout for the purpose of pointing at them as the reasons (indirectly) for the shooting. The people who voted for Castro aren't hate monger supporters either, even though Castro is trying to rile people up to go after Trump supporters, and is guilty of escalating the hate/violence himself. Try, just try, to see the difference.
Backfire. Regardless, of how much Heresatard believes this is such a great, wonderful, legal idea, it really is unseemly. https://freebeacon.com/politics/two...ed-in-his-published-list-of-trump-supporters/ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jo...s-own-donors-in-bid-to-shame-trump-supporters
While inappropriate, it isn't the same as taking private citizens, making them public and telling people they are the reason for the hatred and killings of innocents and indicating folks should go get 'em. They are innocent. Two politicians acting like children and attacking each other isn't the same thing at all. And you know it. But you'll never admit to being in the wrong, you'll just keep obfuscating.
@KimStrassel To those claiming the info @Castro4Congress tweeted about private citizens is collected for this "purpose": so wrong. Transparency laws were supposed to help guard against pay-to-play/corruption; not to be used to incite hate against those engaged in civic process.