So you would support special identification signs of businesses who support "X" proudly? So that Sarah Sanders could have chosen to go to another restaurant other than the Little Red Hen (or whatever it was)? What about hiring/firing people based on their political affiliation? What about product identifiers? You could keep going...
Product and people identifiers would be the way to go. https://newspapers.ushmm.org/events/german-government-forces-jews-to-wear-yellow-stars They did take the guns first.
Hate mongering. You're such a fraud, man. You claim to stand for common sense principles but when called onto the carpet, you immediately surrender those principles to shamelessly pimp for your "team". Just because someone voted for a candidate you don't like doesn't mean they are financiers of hate mongering. I voted for Trump. Does that mean I am a financier of hate mongering because I sent him a $100 donation once upon a time? What a load of horseshit - do you even see what a fucking lunatic you have become? Come back to common sense, man. This country was founded on the ideas of constructive disagreement and discourse. And you are supporting someone who is trying to silence people because of their vote. First you say it wasn't about doxxing anyone, just public info, then you immediately admit that it is about shaming and boycotting - thereby persecuting someone for their vote. You're so back asswards that you don't even know which argument to go with. All you want to do is support your side no matter what!
No, donating to someone I don't like doesn't make one a hate monger financier. Donating to a hate monger does. Why do Republicans turn into melting snowflakes begging to suppress opposing speech when they get called out for their statements/actions? Stand up and proudly admit to donating for the guy you support. Suddenly the tea partiers who stood up and boycotted for change are no longer Patriots but doxxing assholes. Telling someone to not patronize your business isn't persecution, it's literally the free market at work.
I support what's on the books, and political affiliation has no special protection. You know, kind of like you guys do with border enforcement.
Well, there are a lot of "public records" out there, for example where people live. Apparently Castro didn't go far enough with the public records?
Best thing that a mass shooter can do is to go ahead and make a contribution to a couple of the dem candidates. That way if they are caught or are under suspicion, the media will just look the other way.
Please. Because you don't like the man's statement (I assume we're talking about Trump) he's a hate monger. Plenty of democrats have said similar things and similar commentary and have gotten away with it. Plenty. Voting for them or donating to them didn't make them "hate monger financiers". We have a political system that forces someone to choose between two people. Because of this, we have to choose - many times - between the lesser of two evils. What Castro did, and what you support, is the suppression of ideals and voices of those who don't agree with your candidate - end of story. You can pretend whatever you want about it, but that just means you are more and more out of touch each time you do this. You are part of the problem escalating the very violence and rhetoric you claim to be so adamantly against. You are a hate monger of the so called hate monger financiers. Really. We do stand up and proudly support it. But when you point out specific individuals and suggest - indirectly or otherwise - that the people who cast their vote or donated to an individual are responsible for a violent act that left innocents murdered, you are jeopardizing the safety of those individuals by inviting similar violence upon them. Don't you comprehend this? I'm asking sincerely because you seem to be quite intelligent (when you want to be). When emotions are inflamed because of some crazy's action, and then you say "here are the people you should consider doing something to" right afterwards, you are inviting similar actions upon more innocents.
You guys are all over the place. First it's "Trump's violent rhetoric can't be blamed, let's blame video games and mental health instead". Now it's "violent rhetoric must be blamed because it's targeting conservatives". Not to mention there was no "invitation of violence" expressed whatsoever in Castro's statements