Ohhh baby. What seemed to be the problem? Pickup convoys havent been around for what, a year. There were car and even semi mobbings for a while there too. That'll make for a shoppers surprise if they don't chant the proper slogan on que for the highly interested lol crowd at their window, front, back, and far side. Do not touch that gas... uh uh uhhhh. Wouldn't be prudent at this juncture. Answer the question shopper, what's the slogan. That seems downright unfriendly and even unAmerican if I may be so bold. Haven't seen that for a while, so that's good. If we start seeing some agents provocateurs infiltrated into organizations, leading the parade so to speak, inciting to riots and mayem, mobs can get downright rude I'm told. Glad the market is more civilized and traders wait their turn at the exit. What's your take on agents provocateurs?
My entire knowledge of (lol) Is this kind of thing underway these days in the good ol USA perchance do you figure? No idea if this is Total BS or what.. but United States In the United States, the COINTELPRO program of the Federal Bureau of Investigation included FBI agents posing as political activists to disrupt the activities of political groups in the U.S., such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, the American Indian Movement, and the Ku Klux Klan.[4] New York City police officers were accused of acting as agents provocateurs during protests against the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York City.[5] Denver police officers were also alleged to have used undercover detectives to instigate violence against police during the 2008 Democratic National Convention.[6] Agent provocateur From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Agent provocateur (disambiguation). An agent provocateur (French for "inciting agent") is a person who commits or who acts to entice another person to commit an illegal or rash act or falsely implicate them in partaking in an illegal act, so as to ruin the reputation or entice legal action against the target or a group they belong to or are perceived to belong to. They may target any group, such as a peaceful protest or demonstration, a union, a political party or a company. In jurisdictions in which conspiracy is a serious crime in itself, it can be sufficient for the agent provocateur to entrap the target into discussing and planning an illegal act. It is not necessary for the illegal act to be carried out or even prepared. Prevention of infiltration by agents provocateurs is part of the duty of demonstration marshals, also called stewards, deployed by organizers of large or controversial assemblies.[1][2][3]
I trade vol so I am all for it and it will bring down (further) the GOP. 15% vol sucks for me and I could use a little unrest. Or a lot. But no, I don't see the Dems infiltrated by a penetration agent and it's not needed inside the GOP... they are actively pursuing that political stance.
that's a well defined universe of concern as far as it goes. That world is far removed from anything that all but those involved would know. That leaves 99.999 % of us out of that political loop, lol. I never consider party affiliation to tell the truth. I am party-agnostic. The parties are 2 organizations out of the larger world of organizations, you got proud boys, antifa, blm, on and on and on. Those are the areas of concern beyond areas of individual influence for the huge majority of citizens worldwide, far off events and situations where an agent prov or ten find a 'parade' an event even a small as a street intersection in Reno and arrange to march to the front and as mobs go, something a trained agent prov worth their salt knows back and forwards and If apracticed drill was enacted, well mobs have no sense so a few bad apples up front can make things happen, would you agree. The News agencies sell a lot of product when everybody tunes in. News goes wide, yayhoos in special interest groups around the region get frisky, if things go sideways, you get Summertime Blues far from a Reno Intersection. All i know about this field is from wikipedia, so hopefully the people in charge are in control of what's up. In a very good way. The stakes are huge. How many Americans are as prepared as your family for wild yayhoos ignorant of what they are getting into when they don't know dest may not feel comfortable at all with their behavior, so to speak. Good idea to be prepared for the area of concern and influence, difficult to take responsibility for what goes on around the landscape at large, involving all manner of issues, motivations, directives, agendas. There's no shortage of yayhoos on any side of the equation a guy looks at, not much actionable use to go beyond the scope of what's near and dear and influencable. that's plenty handful there. They used to bet busy and deal with things back in the day according to them Wiki boys and girls. between 1956 and 1971.[12] Dest, Would you figure Wiki is correct in this BS? Says here (wiki style) " COINTELPRO tactics are still used to this day and have been alleged to include discrediting targets through psychological warfare; smearing individuals and groups using forged documents and by planting false reports in the media; harassment; wrongful imprisonment; and illegal violence, including assassination.[13][14][15][16] According to a Senate report, the FBI's motivation was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order".[17]" None of that happened in My neighborhood, Yours? Wonder if it affects us from afar as it were? Long Popcorn.
Political Strategery Maneuvers Can have consequences detrimental to the larger governed population outside the corridors of power, Not Always, Not More that Not, It just seems entirely possible that something like could occur when the stakes of the game are so huge, worldwide. Watching politicians work across the isle, or not, happens every day. I don't have a dog in that race on a team against team basis and find benefits and faults on both sides, just like most things. I respect that some citizens have strong opinions and positions that are probably well founded, so to each their own. You'd be surprises how often it is assumed if one does not show inclination toward one Party, it is assumed that person falls in the opposing camp. Mighty handy pigeonhole, steriotype, and claiming not to be a Tory if something commented on about a Whig spawns an affront to a Whig supporter, it is understandable to figure a knee-jerk reaction is warranted. Not much can be done about it by the agnostic but to just continue on and sooner or later people will realize, hell he aint bullshitting, he really has no bias toward one team or the other. Some never get there, not like top of their list to deal with, lol. Some get a lilttle PO'd and well again, thats unfortunate for the agnostic. You got Coach Hastert on the Republican Team, I've mentioned what a creep that dude was in this forum repeatedly just to heads up to Hastert's opposing team members that there some real winners on both sides of the coin. Some bright effective people on both sides as well.
They should have used live fire to defend themselves and then be pardoned. Not that there would have been a crime there on their part but it saves them the legal hassles.
DA preferred to save himself the embarrassment, still, felony Arson for narrating an incident on FB: The affidavit by an OCSO deputy reads, “As wanton destruction is taking place on the OSCO vehicle Ruffin states ‘…Niggas is fucking up their shit in front of their face and them niggas ain’t doing shit, that’s what happens when you got numbers outside…'”