So you can't find any points in the scientific paper or the article that are incorrect... you merely will make fun of the url, eh? While we are at it... Did Greenland & W Antarctic Ice Sheet Loss Suddenly Double? No http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/08/did-greenland-w-antarctic-ice-sheet.html
I love the scale of the y-axis on this chart and also this statement: 'with the effects of ENSO, solar irradiance, and volcanic emissions removed (Foster and Rahmstorf 2011)" Thank the Lord all five data sets were "adjusted". And thank you for a good laugh!
I assume piezoe has me on ignore. Otherwise he would know that he is making a fool of himself and would not continue to say ridiculous things. Piezoe, this kind of post just boggles my mind. Not that I should be surprised. But what surprises me is how reasonable you are on other topics. It's like you are bipolar or something.
So are you telling us that you don't understand the point of the study? At this point I must assume that you are not intellectually honest at all. The comment on the y axis is telling, as is the fact that you willfully ignore the point, which is that without natural inputs to the warming trend, the warming trend deviation is quite small. I thought you were supposed to be a smart guy? What's going on?
IOW, you are shocked that he breaks from the "leftist" playbook on occasion... OTOH, it's quite common amongst your adversaries...You couldn't get all of us to sit around and defend the so-called "right wing" like our lives depended upon it.