How Stupid Can An American President Be?

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Nolan-Vinny-Sam, Nov 19, 2003.

  1. Question: How Stupid Can An American President Be?
    by Stan Moore
    (Wednesday 19 November 2003)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "Answer: As stupid as the American people will tolerate! The next election
    will define the answer."

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Evidence:
    George W. Bush says Iraqi's want "freedom", but he is too stupid to understand that Iraqi's want freedom from American hegemony, occupation, and control of their fiscal and economic affairs. Bush' behavior actually makes some Iraqis nostalgic for Saddam Hussein.
    George W. Bush says Iraqi's want "democracy", but his version of democracy is an appointed council, similar to the non-democratic process that installed Bush rather than electing him.
    George W. Bush says Iraqi's need a new constitution, and he insists that the new "interim" constitution reflect "American values". How stupid is it to install a value system of an upstart power (whose primary "wisdom" is "might makes right") over one of the world's oldest civilizations?
    George W. Bush decries "foreign fighters" in Iraq, although American/Britain have placed about 150,000 foreign fighters in Iraq and are trying to recruit more! Apparently, Bush thinks Iraq is a colony of America!
    George W. Bush thinks the more American soldiers are killed by Iraqis, the better the situation is for American interests, because it means the Iraqi freedom fighters are "desperate". In contrast, the American military thinks the situation means Iraqis are increasingly organized and acting in a rational insurgency against a foreign occupier.
    George W. Bush thinks American fatalities are "bad". He does not express any opinion at all on Iraqi fatalities, even of innocent victims of American misconduct. This is a stupid way of looking at Iraqi suffering.
    George W. Bush does not attend funerals of American servicemen, does not concern himself with quality of treatment of wounded American servicemen, and does not want the American people to see visual images of American wounded or dead as they are buried or brought home to America. This is a stupid way of dealing with American suffering.
    George W. Bush thinks military attacks by Iraqis on America's occupying military are "terrorism". This is a stupid way of looking at insurgency or guerilla warfare.
    George W Bush thinks that attacking Iraqis in Iraq will make the resistance to American occupation go away. It is questionable whether this is evidence of stupidity or delusion.
    Bush placed a viceroy in Iraq who does not speak Arabic, does not meet with the Iraqi citizens, and who walls himself off in a secure fortress to keep his ass from getting blown up with rocket-propelled grenades each and every day. Yet, Bush is stupid enough to think his system meets the needs of Iraqis.
    If the situation were reversed, and Saddam Hussein was in power in the U.S. and offering $25 Million for the head of George W. Bush, how long would it take for some American citizen to deliver up "W." and claim the prize? You don't have to be stupid to figure that one out!

    ummm Maverick74 et all feel free to comment on Inca civilization, Napoleon, and ummmm Florida elections?:D :D

    Bush will surely get re-elected, $$$$$ is no object, thank God for HAl-oil connections, mashrooms for public, and 100% certainty if we go electronic elections bwahahaha what a joke..:( :(
     
  2. Stan Moore and Nolan-Vinny-Sam are both stupid, Mosque worshipping, Moslem extremist loving, anti-American communists, who would rather be in Tehran eating a dick sandwich than supporting our fight against tyranny .
     
  3. HA!!!!!!!!
    :DMaureen yer da best:D Leave Iran out of this... you...

    Review the last reply to you, please point to your picture....we'd love to know which face is yours. ahahaha

    :D Yo Mr chachingo!!! ahahaha who's your daddy? Come clean :D

    http://my.skali.com/photo/image.php?id=9238&type=1

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=24581
     
  4. You don't even know what Communism looks like ! My family and I have escaped such communism and you can't also know that's what they are preparing for the whole world including America with so called "New World Order" from Bush to Gorbatchev and behind stands the CFR who is projecting <font color=RED>communism</FONT> :

    "If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then this lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging ‘New World Order’ we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long."
    President George Bush (January 1991)

    “The ultimate aim of the Council on Foreign Relations [directed by Rockfeller] is to create a one-world <font color=RED>socialist</FONT> system and make the United States an official part of it.”

    Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI staff in Washington conducted an investigation of the aims of the Council on Foreign Relations


    "All countries are basically social arrangements.… No matter how permanent and even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary.… Within the next hundred years … nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority."

    Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, Clinton's roommate at Oxford, wrote this in Time magazine, July 20, 1992

    "Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order."

    Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

     
  5. Who in facts finances the socialist mentality in the background ?
    http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/gary_allen_rocker/ch1-4.html

    "The Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations had jumped into the financing of education and the social sciences with both Left feet. For example, the foundations (principally Carnegie and Rockefeller) stimulated two-thirds of the total endowment funding of all institutions of higher learning in America during the first third of this century. During this period the Carnegie-Rockefeller complex supplied 20 % of the total income of colleges and universities and became in fact, if not in name, a sort of U.S. Ministry of Education. The result was a sharp Socialist-Fascist turn. As Rene Wormser, Counsel for the Reece Committee, reports:

    A very powerful complex of foundations and allied organizations has developed over the years to exercise a high degree of control over education. Part of this complex, and ultimately responsible for it, are the Rockefeller and Carnegie groups of foundations.

    These foundations were, by way of grants amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars, responsible for the nationwide acceptance of avowed socialist John Dewey's theories of progressive education and permissiveness -the products of which have been marching on our college campuses for the past two decades.

    Traditionalist teachers, who had been strongly resisting Deweyism, were swamped by education propagandists backed with a flood of Rockefeller-Carnegie dollars. At the same time the National Education Association, the country's chief education lobby, was also financed largely by the Rockfellers and Carnegie foundations.

    It, too, threw its considerable weight behind the Dewey philosophies. As an NEA report maintained in 1934:

    A dying laissez-faire must be completely destroyed and all of us, including the "owners," must be subjected to a large degree of social control.

    Since America's public school system was decentralized, the foundations had concentrated on influencing schools of education (particularly Columbia, the spawning ground for Deweyism), and on financing the writing of textbooks which were subsequently adopted nationwide. These foundation-produced textbooks were so heavily slanted in favor of socialism that Wormser concluded:"- It is difficult to believe that the Rockefeller Foundation and the National Education Association could have supported these textbooks. But the fact is that Rockefeller financed them and the N.E.A. promoted them very widely.-"

    "Religion is also an important molder of public opinion.

    For many years the Rockefeller Dynasty has bankrolled the Union Theological Seminary of New York, which has done so much to turn the clergy towards state socialism fascism, and to destroy the tenets of traditional Christianity. The highly influential seminary is known for turning out " Christian-Communists.

    The family's chief religious philanthropy for a number of years was the notorious Federal Council of Churches, which was pronounced by US Naval Intelligence in 1936 as one of the most dangerous, subversive organizations in the country. According to Naval Intelligence:

    It is a large radical -pacifist- organization, and probably represents 20,000,000 Protestants in the United States. However, its leadership consists of a small group which dictates its policies. It is always extremely active in any matters against national defense.

    In its many official pronouncements, the Federal Council attacked free enterprise, capitalism and the American way of life, and boldly advocated Socialism. In an official report in 1932,the Federal Council stated:

    " The Christian ideal calls for hearty support of a planned economic system.... It demands that cooperation shall replace competition as a fundamental method."
     
  6. According to Congressman Ron Paul in August 30th of this year:

    "I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Goverment, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!..."

    http://www.propagandamatrix.com/260903ronpaul.html



    This rejoins the warning of Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner
    http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html
    According to him terrorism is just a pretext for a planned "open world dictatorship" within 5 years :

    Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D. a former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner. On November 6, he told FTW, "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens."


    WTO gives you the taste. WTO, unlike other International Organisation has now a supranational power to sanction any country independtly of its government will including US that is to say the US government and others more and more in the future will transfer the decision to such foreign institutions that resides in foreign country like Switzerland as for WTO.
     
  7. msfe

    msfe

  8. America's not a bad place. If we could just convince the liberals to go live in Europe where they belong...
     
  9. right.... right!!!:cool:

    kinda liked you better as hapaboy tho...:D :D :p
     
  10. Not for long: it will tend to become socialist as Europe because it is what Rockfeller wants and it is now near the term that he achieved that long planned scheme for the Whole World including America - for are you naïve to think that big global business is attached to some specific country by patriotism ? Patriotism is exploited to create conflicts and then will come Order after Chaos, the New World Socialist Order with less and less individual freedom :

    Republican U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater
    in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

    "The Trilateral Commission [founded by Rockfeller/Brezinski] is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system ,they will rule the future."

    “The ultimate aim of the Council on Foreign Relations [directed by Rockfeller] is to create a one-world socialist system and make the United States an official part of it.”

    Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI staff in Washington conducted an investigation of the aims of the Council on Foreign Relations

    According to Congressman Ron Paul in August 30th of this year:

    "I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Goverment, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!..."

    http://www.propagandamatrix.com/260903ronpaul.html



    This rejoins the warning of Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner
    http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html
    According to him terrorism is just a pretext for a planned "open world dictatorship" within 5 years :

    Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D. a former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner. On November 6, he told FTW, "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens."

     
    #10     Nov 20, 2003